Curio Cabinet
- By Date
- By Type
August 27, 2025
-
FREEBiology Nerdy CurioFree1 CQ
They might howl in the night, but there’s no need for fright! Coyotes are often compared to wolves, yet while gray wolves (the most common North American species) remain endangered, coyotes are listed as a “species of least concern” with an increasing population. This difference is largely due to the fact that, despite looking like small, lean wolves, coyotes live very differently than their wolf brethren.
Native to central and North America, coyotes thrive in a variety of habitats, from deserts to forests to, surprisingly, suburban areas. They are larger than foxes but smaller than wolves, measuring up to 52 inches long and 26 inches tall. Live wolves, they live in packs consisting of a dominant, mated pair, and their children, including a mix of younger and older pups. Usually, there are only three to seven coyotes per pack, compared to gray wolf packs that often range between 10 to 20 individuals.
Smaller pack sizes seem to suit coyotes just fine, since they don’t prey on animals nearly as large as the caribou and bison that gray wolves do. Instead, coyotes hunt small mammals like rabbits and rodents…when they hunt at all. A key to coyotes’ survival, even in the face of climate change and habitat loss, is their highly adaptable diet. Coyotes can live off of a mix of freshly-hunted meat, carrion, wild fruit, and even garbage left behind by humans. In fact, coyotes that live near suburban areas are routinely caught raiding trash cans. They also employ other tricks to survive, like their unique howling style full of yips and changing notes. When these howls echo over long distances, they can easily make it sound like a coyote pack is much bigger than it actually is, thus scaring away potential threats. As scary as coyotes seem to some people, they actually have to worry about falling prey to larger animals like bears, mountain lions, and even wolves. Family resemblance won’t save you in the wild.
[Image description: A coyote walking in a desert landscape, looking back over one shoulder.] Credit & copyright: Cape Hatteras National Seashore, NPS, Asset ID:347d7710-ba38-4735-809b-9f82bc9c8437. Public domain: Full Granting Rights.They might howl in the night, but there’s no need for fright! Coyotes are often compared to wolves, yet while gray wolves (the most common North American species) remain endangered, coyotes are listed as a “species of least concern” with an increasing population. This difference is largely due to the fact that, despite looking like small, lean wolves, coyotes live very differently than their wolf brethren.
Native to central and North America, coyotes thrive in a variety of habitats, from deserts to forests to, surprisingly, suburban areas. They are larger than foxes but smaller than wolves, measuring up to 52 inches long and 26 inches tall. Live wolves, they live in packs consisting of a dominant, mated pair, and their children, including a mix of younger and older pups. Usually, there are only three to seven coyotes per pack, compared to gray wolf packs that often range between 10 to 20 individuals.
Smaller pack sizes seem to suit coyotes just fine, since they don’t prey on animals nearly as large as the caribou and bison that gray wolves do. Instead, coyotes hunt small mammals like rabbits and rodents…when they hunt at all. A key to coyotes’ survival, even in the face of climate change and habitat loss, is their highly adaptable diet. Coyotes can live off of a mix of freshly-hunted meat, carrion, wild fruit, and even garbage left behind by humans. In fact, coyotes that live near suburban areas are routinely caught raiding trash cans. They also employ other tricks to survive, like their unique howling style full of yips and changing notes. When these howls echo over long distances, they can easily make it sound like a coyote pack is much bigger than it actually is, thus scaring away potential threats. As scary as coyotes seem to some people, they actually have to worry about falling prey to larger animals like bears, mountain lions, and even wolves. Family resemblance won’t save you in the wild.
[Image description: A coyote walking in a desert landscape, looking back over one shoulder.] Credit & copyright: Cape Hatteras National Seashore, NPS, Asset ID:347d7710-ba38-4735-809b-9f82bc9c8437. Public domain: Full Granting Rights. -
FREEHumanities Daily Curio #3141Free1 CQ
Ah, an archaeological dig examining the bygone era of… 1978? Archaeologists at the University of Glasgow in Scotland have invited the public and aging skaters to help in the excavation of a buried skatepark, shedding light on a bit of old European skater lore. The 1970s were a time of change, not just in terms of music and (questionable) fashion, but also in the world of sports. In Scotland, skateboarding exploded in popularity as it did in the U.S., and in 1978, the city of Glasgow invested £100,000 to build the country’s first skatepark, the Kelvin Wheelies. The skatepark featured a freestyle area, a slalom run, and a halfpipe, among other ambitious features that would have made any skater at the time drool with delight. The very year it opened, the facility hosted the first Scottish Skateboard Championships. Skaters from all around the U.K. gathered to compete and for a few years, Glasgow skaters were some of the best of the best in the U.K. Unfortunately, there was a sharp decline in the sport just a few years after the skatepark opened, and the skatepark began to see fewer visitors. Over time, it fell into disrepair, and the city made the decision to bulldoze the park due to safety concerns. It was then buried underground, with a few features remaining visible on the surface. Even without the concrete remnants jutting through the ground, Glasgow skaters from those days never forgot the park. Now, however, they may get to help resurrect the glories of yesteryear with archaeologists who are seeking their help in identifying the skatepark’s features and layout as they excavate the site. In addition to getting down and dirty themselves, the skaters hope that the site will be marked in such a way that its historic significance can be remembered properly. While skateboarding may have dipped in popularity for a time in Scotland, it’s now more popular than ever around the world and has even made it into the Olympics, so it’s understandable that skating enthusiasts hold the site in such high regard. Also, by all accounts, those bowls were absolutely sick!
[Image description: A green sign on a chainlink fence. White letters read: “No Skateboarding Allowed: Police Take Notice.”] Credit & copyright: Khrystinasnell, Wikimedia Commons. This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.Ah, an archaeological dig examining the bygone era of… 1978? Archaeologists at the University of Glasgow in Scotland have invited the public and aging skaters to help in the excavation of a buried skatepark, shedding light on a bit of old European skater lore. The 1970s were a time of change, not just in terms of music and (questionable) fashion, but also in the world of sports. In Scotland, skateboarding exploded in popularity as it did in the U.S., and in 1978, the city of Glasgow invested £100,000 to build the country’s first skatepark, the Kelvin Wheelies. The skatepark featured a freestyle area, a slalom run, and a halfpipe, among other ambitious features that would have made any skater at the time drool with delight. The very year it opened, the facility hosted the first Scottish Skateboard Championships. Skaters from all around the U.K. gathered to compete and for a few years, Glasgow skaters were some of the best of the best in the U.K. Unfortunately, there was a sharp decline in the sport just a few years after the skatepark opened, and the skatepark began to see fewer visitors. Over time, it fell into disrepair, and the city made the decision to bulldoze the park due to safety concerns. It was then buried underground, with a few features remaining visible on the surface. Even without the concrete remnants jutting through the ground, Glasgow skaters from those days never forgot the park. Now, however, they may get to help resurrect the glories of yesteryear with archaeologists who are seeking their help in identifying the skatepark’s features and layout as they excavate the site. In addition to getting down and dirty themselves, the skaters hope that the site will be marked in such a way that its historic significance can be remembered properly. While skateboarding may have dipped in popularity for a time in Scotland, it’s now more popular than ever around the world and has even made it into the Olympics, so it’s understandable that skating enthusiasts hold the site in such high regard. Also, by all accounts, those bowls were absolutely sick!
[Image description: A green sign on a chainlink fence. White letters read: “No Skateboarding Allowed: Police Take Notice.”] Credit & copyright: Khrystinasnell, Wikimedia Commons. This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.
August 26, 2025
-
FREEUS History Daily Curio #3140Free1 CQ
This wasn’t your average tea party…in fact, it wasn’t even like the other famous revolutionary tea party. With so much political upheaval going on today, it’s worth looking back on different ways that Americans have protested over the centuries, including subtle ways. The Edenton Tea Party of 1774 was quite civil, but made a powerful statement all the same.
The English love their tea, and so did early American colonists. It’s no wonder, then, that when it came to unfair taxation, a tax on tea was a particularly contentious issue. When the British Parliament passed the Tea Act in 1773 and gave the British East India Tea Company a monopoly on the commodity, they probably knew that it would ruffle feathers across the pond. They might not have been prepared for just how ruffled those feathers got, though. That same year, the famous Boston Tea Party took place, during which protesters dumped 90,000 pounds of tea into the Boston Harbor. At the same time, women were encouraged to eschew British imports to participate in politics in their own way.
One woman, named Penelope Barker, took this idea a step further. On October 25, 1774, after the First Continental Congress had passed several non-importation resolutions, Barker gathered 50 women together in what would become the first political protest held by women in America. On the surface it appeared to be like any large tea party, but there were some key differences. Instead of tea made from tea leaves, Barker served herbal tea made from local plants like mulberry leaves and lavender. Furthermore, the attendees signed the 51 Ladies’ Resolution, which expressed political will as women “who are essentially interested in their welfare, to do everything as far as lies in our power to testify our sincere adherence to the same.” Unlike the men who disguised themselves to hide their identities in the Boston Tea Party, the women specifically rejected the idea of hiding. Thus, they exposed themselves to potential public backlash aimed at them personally. As expected, they were mocked heavily by British newspapers, but they also inspired other women in the colonies to have tea parties of their own, bringing more women into the political landscape for the first time. Nothing like a good cup of tea to kick off a revolution.
[Image description: An American flag with a wooden flagpole.] Credit & copyright: Crefollet, Wikimedia Commons. This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.This wasn’t your average tea party…in fact, it wasn’t even like the other famous revolutionary tea party. With so much political upheaval going on today, it’s worth looking back on different ways that Americans have protested over the centuries, including subtle ways. The Edenton Tea Party of 1774 was quite civil, but made a powerful statement all the same.
The English love their tea, and so did early American colonists. It’s no wonder, then, that when it came to unfair taxation, a tax on tea was a particularly contentious issue. When the British Parliament passed the Tea Act in 1773 and gave the British East India Tea Company a monopoly on the commodity, they probably knew that it would ruffle feathers across the pond. They might not have been prepared for just how ruffled those feathers got, though. That same year, the famous Boston Tea Party took place, during which protesters dumped 90,000 pounds of tea into the Boston Harbor. At the same time, women were encouraged to eschew British imports to participate in politics in their own way.
One woman, named Penelope Barker, took this idea a step further. On October 25, 1774, after the First Continental Congress had passed several non-importation resolutions, Barker gathered 50 women together in what would become the first political protest held by women in America. On the surface it appeared to be like any large tea party, but there were some key differences. Instead of tea made from tea leaves, Barker served herbal tea made from local plants like mulberry leaves and lavender. Furthermore, the attendees signed the 51 Ladies’ Resolution, which expressed political will as women “who are essentially interested in their welfare, to do everything as far as lies in our power to testify our sincere adherence to the same.” Unlike the men who disguised themselves to hide their identities in the Boston Tea Party, the women specifically rejected the idea of hiding. Thus, they exposed themselves to potential public backlash aimed at them personally. As expected, they were mocked heavily by British newspapers, but they also inspired other women in the colonies to have tea parties of their own, bringing more women into the political landscape for the first time. Nothing like a good cup of tea to kick off a revolution.
[Image description: An American flag with a wooden flagpole.] Credit & copyright: Crefollet, Wikimedia Commons. This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.
August 25, 2025
-
FREEArt Appreciation Art CurioFree1 CQ
It’s a terrible habit—if only it didn’t inspire such romance. Tobacco made its way into Japan in the 16th century, and it has been a source of inspiration and consternation ever since. The piece above, Tobacco Pouch and Pipe by Kubo Shunman shows a Japanese-style smoking pipe and an elaborately-embroidered pouch with green, red, and yellow floral designs. Above the items is Japanese text written in vertical lines. Tobacco is native to the Americas, and therefore was unknown to Asian cultures until it was introduced by European traders. The Japanese were first exposed to the plant by Portuguese traders, and the habit of smoking quickly became popular. There were attempts by the Japanese government to ban its use, but they were unsuccessful. Tobacco cultivation soon became an established industry in Japan and the plant was introduced to Korea by Japanese traders around the same time. The piece above doesn’t just depict tobacco paraphernalia but contains a poem that expresses an appreciation for smoking. Who knows if the artist’s sentiments would be the same if he’d had modern knowledge of how dangerous tobacco is.
Tobacco Pouch and Pipe, Kubo Shunman (1757–1820), 1813, Woodblock print (surimono); ink and color on paper, 7.87 x 7.12 in. (20 x 18.1 cm.), The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York City, New York
[Image credit & copyright: Kubo Shunman, The Metropolitan Museum of Art. H. O. Havemeyer Collection, Bequest of Mrs. H. O. Havemeyer, 1929. Public Domain.]It’s a terrible habit—if only it didn’t inspire such romance. Tobacco made its way into Japan in the 16th century, and it has been a source of inspiration and consternation ever since. The piece above, Tobacco Pouch and Pipe by Kubo Shunman shows a Japanese-style smoking pipe and an elaborately-embroidered pouch with green, red, and yellow floral designs. Above the items is Japanese text written in vertical lines. Tobacco is native to the Americas, and therefore was unknown to Asian cultures until it was introduced by European traders. The Japanese were first exposed to the plant by Portuguese traders, and the habit of smoking quickly became popular. There were attempts by the Japanese government to ban its use, but they were unsuccessful. Tobacco cultivation soon became an established industry in Japan and the plant was introduced to Korea by Japanese traders around the same time. The piece above doesn’t just depict tobacco paraphernalia but contains a poem that expresses an appreciation for smoking. Who knows if the artist’s sentiments would be the same if he’d had modern knowledge of how dangerous tobacco is.
Tobacco Pouch and Pipe, Kubo Shunman (1757–1820), 1813, Woodblock print (surimono); ink and color on paper, 7.87 x 7.12 in. (20 x 18.1 cm.), The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York City, New York
[Image credit & copyright: Kubo Shunman, The Metropolitan Museum of Art. H. O. Havemeyer Collection, Bequest of Mrs. H. O. Havemeyer, 1929. Public Domain.] -
FREEScience Daily Curio #3139Free1 CQ
Who knew that weeds could be so helpful? Increasingly powerful storms and rising sea levels are quickly eroding Scotland’s coastline, but the solution to slowing the progress might lie in a humble seaweed. Coastal erosion is a growing concern around the world, and the issue is as dire as can be in Scotland. In some communities, buildings are located a literal stone’s throw from the water, and erosion is encroaching on homes, businesses, and historic sites. However, researchers at Heriot-Watt University have found a simple and plentiful resource that could slow the encroachment to a crawl: kelp. Using computer modeling, researchers tested the effectiveness of kelp and other natural barriers like seagrass, oyster reefs, and mussel beds in dampening the devastating energy carried by ocean waves. What they found was that these barriers could reduce the impact and height of incoming waves to a surprising degree. Kelp was the most effective, capable of reducing wave height by up to 70 percent depending on exact location. The problem with natural barriers is that they too are in decline in many areas due to climate change. Kelp forests are already struggling to survive rising temperatures in some areas, and they could easily be wiped out during a devastating storm, leaving nearby communities more vulnerable until the kelp can recover. Researchers say that legislation may be the next, crucial step in stopping the erosion of Scotland’s coasts. If natural barriers are protected via legislation, they could not only contribute to a diverse marine habitat but act as a natural defense against erosion and flooding. Kelp also constitutes much of the ecosystem that fisheries relies on, so protecting them would directly benefit the economy too. It’s a green solution in more ways than one.
[Image description: A kelp forest underwater.] Credit & copyright: U.S. National Park Service, Asset ID: 0DB56032-0224-DD48-5D902DA5B1D6C3F5. Public domain: Full Granting Rights.Who knew that weeds could be so helpful? Increasingly powerful storms and rising sea levels are quickly eroding Scotland’s coastline, but the solution to slowing the progress might lie in a humble seaweed. Coastal erosion is a growing concern around the world, and the issue is as dire as can be in Scotland. In some communities, buildings are located a literal stone’s throw from the water, and erosion is encroaching on homes, businesses, and historic sites. However, researchers at Heriot-Watt University have found a simple and plentiful resource that could slow the encroachment to a crawl: kelp. Using computer modeling, researchers tested the effectiveness of kelp and other natural barriers like seagrass, oyster reefs, and mussel beds in dampening the devastating energy carried by ocean waves. What they found was that these barriers could reduce the impact and height of incoming waves to a surprising degree. Kelp was the most effective, capable of reducing wave height by up to 70 percent depending on exact location. The problem with natural barriers is that they too are in decline in many areas due to climate change. Kelp forests are already struggling to survive rising temperatures in some areas, and they could easily be wiped out during a devastating storm, leaving nearby communities more vulnerable until the kelp can recover. Researchers say that legislation may be the next, crucial step in stopping the erosion of Scotland’s coasts. If natural barriers are protected via legislation, they could not only contribute to a diverse marine habitat but act as a natural defense against erosion and flooding. Kelp also constitutes much of the ecosystem that fisheries relies on, so protecting them would directly benefit the economy too. It’s a green solution in more ways than one.
[Image description: A kelp forest underwater.] Credit & copyright: U.S. National Park Service, Asset ID: 0DB56032-0224-DD48-5D902DA5B1D6C3F5. Public domain: Full Granting Rights.
August 24, 2025
-
FREESpelling PP&T CurioFree1 CQ
There’s been a lot of buzz about these bees for quite some time. Spelling competitions have been around for a few hundred years now, thanks to the many idiosyncrasies of the English language. In the U.S., popular obsession over correct spelling led to the creation of the spelling bee. What started as small community events eventually grew into a national sport, though it wasn’t always as friendly as one might assume.
The very idea of a spelling bee would have been shocking just a few centuries ago. Until the 17th century, there was not really such a thing as “proper” spelling in the English language. Even as spelling became more standardized, not everyone adhered to it. It’s hard to blame anyone for not being interested in standardized spelling in English, considering how the language has evolved over its existence. Since English contains so many words sourced from so many different languages, there are plenty of words that aren’t spelled the same way they’re pronounced.
Attitudes toward spelling might have changed with the Puritans, who promoted consistent spelling when writing scripture as a show of piety. Around the 18th century, Americans began taking an interest in spelling as a recreational activity, pitting their knowledge against each other in spelling matches in social settings. After the publication of Noah Webster’s spelling books (often called The Blue-backed Speller) in 1786, the standardization of spelling in America began to fully take root in the educational system. Even so, the idea of proper spelling remained distinctly American for a while. In Britain, for example, people were more focused on pronunciation than spelling to show off their education and status. Regardless, spelling bees began popping up in communities around the U.S. in the 19th century, and the first national spelling bee was just around the corner.
Most spelling bees have fairly simple rules. Since English contains many homonyms, the “speller” can request that the “pronouncer” define a word and use it in a sentence to resolve the ambiguity. The pronouncers, who speak the word that is to be spelled, are held to a standard as well. Judges at spelling bees not only determine if the speller is correct, they also ensure that the pronouncers say the word according to diacritical markings. These rules have remained almost unchanged since the first national spelling bee in 1908, organized by the National Education Association (NEA). The competition was held in Cleveland, Ohio, but the NEA never held another national spelling bee. That’s partly because the winner of the competition was Marie Bolden, a 14-year-old Black girl who competed for Cleveland on an integrated team despite the protests of white competitors from Louisiana. Bolden’s victory defied racial stereotypes and there was a national outcry at the idea that a Black child could win over white children, though she was celebrated and recognized locally. It wasn’t until 1925 that another national spelling bee would be held in the form of the United States National Spelling Bee, sponsored by The Courier-Journal in Louisville, Kentucky. The Scripps Howard News Service acquired sponsorship rights in 1941, and they have run the competition ever since.
Today, the Scripps National Spelling Bee takes place every year, and it’s no longer exclusively an American sport. Spellers come from all over the world, even from countries where English isn’t the primary language. Spelling bees are arguably more popular today than they’ve ever been. The Scripps National Spelling Bee has been televised since 1994 on ESPN, and the competition has only ever been skipped four times: during WWII from 1943 to 1945, and during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. It’s never been a better time to be a stickler for spelling.
[Image description: A blue background with three diagonal letters: a red uppercase B, an orange lowercase e, and a yellow uppercase E.] Credit & copyright: Author-created image. Public domain.There’s been a lot of buzz about these bees for quite some time. Spelling competitions have been around for a few hundred years now, thanks to the many idiosyncrasies of the English language. In the U.S., popular obsession over correct spelling led to the creation of the spelling bee. What started as small community events eventually grew into a national sport, though it wasn’t always as friendly as one might assume.
The very idea of a spelling bee would have been shocking just a few centuries ago. Until the 17th century, there was not really such a thing as “proper” spelling in the English language. Even as spelling became more standardized, not everyone adhered to it. It’s hard to blame anyone for not being interested in standardized spelling in English, considering how the language has evolved over its existence. Since English contains so many words sourced from so many different languages, there are plenty of words that aren’t spelled the same way they’re pronounced.
Attitudes toward spelling might have changed with the Puritans, who promoted consistent spelling when writing scripture as a show of piety. Around the 18th century, Americans began taking an interest in spelling as a recreational activity, pitting their knowledge against each other in spelling matches in social settings. After the publication of Noah Webster’s spelling books (often called The Blue-backed Speller) in 1786, the standardization of spelling in America began to fully take root in the educational system. Even so, the idea of proper spelling remained distinctly American for a while. In Britain, for example, people were more focused on pronunciation than spelling to show off their education and status. Regardless, spelling bees began popping up in communities around the U.S. in the 19th century, and the first national spelling bee was just around the corner.
Most spelling bees have fairly simple rules. Since English contains many homonyms, the “speller” can request that the “pronouncer” define a word and use it in a sentence to resolve the ambiguity. The pronouncers, who speak the word that is to be spelled, are held to a standard as well. Judges at spelling bees not only determine if the speller is correct, they also ensure that the pronouncers say the word according to diacritical markings. These rules have remained almost unchanged since the first national spelling bee in 1908, organized by the National Education Association (NEA). The competition was held in Cleveland, Ohio, but the NEA never held another national spelling bee. That’s partly because the winner of the competition was Marie Bolden, a 14-year-old Black girl who competed for Cleveland on an integrated team despite the protests of white competitors from Louisiana. Bolden’s victory defied racial stereotypes and there was a national outcry at the idea that a Black child could win over white children, though she was celebrated and recognized locally. It wasn’t until 1925 that another national spelling bee would be held in the form of the United States National Spelling Bee, sponsored by The Courier-Journal in Louisville, Kentucky. The Scripps Howard News Service acquired sponsorship rights in 1941, and they have run the competition ever since.
Today, the Scripps National Spelling Bee takes place every year, and it’s no longer exclusively an American sport. Spellers come from all over the world, even from countries where English isn’t the primary language. Spelling bees are arguably more popular today than they’ve ever been. The Scripps National Spelling Bee has been televised since 1994 on ESPN, and the competition has only ever been skipped four times: during WWII from 1943 to 1945, and during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. It’s never been a better time to be a stickler for spelling.
[Image description: A blue background with three diagonal letters: a red uppercase B, an orange lowercase e, and a yellow uppercase E.] Credit & copyright: Author-created image. Public domain.
August 23, 2025
-
FREESports Sporty CurioFree1 CQ
To the winner go the spoils and to the crowd goes the champagne. NASCAR fans recently witnessed driver Connor Zilisch trip and fall while celebrating in Victory Lane, breaking his collarbone as he attempted to climb onto the roof of his car. He was thus denied the chance to shake up and spray a bottle of champagne, a tradition with a long history in motorsports. Though drinking and driving don’t typically go together, motorsports and champagne are a famous pair. Winning drivers—especially in F1—love to have their “champagne moments” on the podium, shaking up a bottle and letting it explode over the crowd. The tradition has its origins in the 1950 France Grand Prix, when the winner was given a bottle of Moët and Chandon on the podium, though he didn’t “share” it on the spot. It wasn’t until the 1966 Le Mans race that champagne was spilled on the podium for the first time by Swiss driver Jo Siffert, and that was just an accident. The next year, at Le Mans, American Dan Gurney deliberately shook up his bottle and sprayed it all over the crowd, giving rise to a new tradition that quickly spread throughout motorsports. There’s one notable exception, though. At the Indianapolis 500, winners are given milk instead of champagne. That tradition began in 1936, after Louis Meyer asked for buttermilk to quench his thirst. Milk after a grueling race on a hot racetrack? Those drivers are braver than most.
To the winner go the spoils and to the crowd goes the champagne. NASCAR fans recently witnessed driver Connor Zilisch trip and fall while celebrating in Victory Lane, breaking his collarbone as he attempted to climb onto the roof of his car. He was thus denied the chance to shake up and spray a bottle of champagne, a tradition with a long history in motorsports. Though drinking and driving don’t typically go together, motorsports and champagne are a famous pair. Winning drivers—especially in F1—love to have their “champagne moments” on the podium, shaking up a bottle and letting it explode over the crowd. The tradition has its origins in the 1950 France Grand Prix, when the winner was given a bottle of Moët and Chandon on the podium, though he didn’t “share” it on the spot. It wasn’t until the 1966 Le Mans race that champagne was spilled on the podium for the first time by Swiss driver Jo Siffert, and that was just an accident. The next year, at Le Mans, American Dan Gurney deliberately shook up his bottle and sprayed it all over the crowd, giving rise to a new tradition that quickly spread throughout motorsports. There’s one notable exception, though. At the Indianapolis 500, winners are given milk instead of champagne. That tradition began in 1936, after Louis Meyer asked for buttermilk to quench his thirst. Milk after a grueling race on a hot racetrack? Those drivers are braver than most.
August 22, 2025
-
FREEMind + Body Daily CurioFree1 CQ
They’re a staple across the pond, but the most likely place to find these eggs in the U.S. is at a Renaissance fair! Scotch eggs have been around for centuries, but have fallen out of favor in many of the places they were once popular. Associated with Britain yet seemingly named after Scotland, these sausage-covered snacks might actually have roots in India or Africa.
A Scotch egg is a hard-boiled or soft-boiled egg covered in sausage, then coated in breadcrumbs and deep fried. Home cooks sometimes choose to bake their Scotch eggs for convenience, and they can be served whole or cut into slices.
Scotch eggs are a popular pub food in the U.K., and in the U.S. they’re associated with historic Britain, making them popular at Renaissance faires and other European-themed events, but few other places. In truth, no one actually knows where Scotch eggs came from, though they definitely didn’t originate in Scotland, despite their name. One story claims that Scotch eggs were named after 19th-century restauranteurs William J Scott & Sons, of Whitby in Yorkshire, England. Supposedly, they served eggs called “Scotties”, coated in fish paste rather than sausage. There are plenty of other theories, of course. London department store Fortnum & Mason has long held that they invented Scotch eggs in the 18th century as a snack for wealthy customers. It’s also plausible that Scotch eggs aren’t European at all, but that they originated in Africa or India. African recipes for foods similar to Scotch eggs have been found, and might have been brought to England via trade or exploration during the reign of Queen Elizabeth I, between 1558 to 1603. It’s also possible that Scotch eggs were based on an Indian dish called nargisi kofta in which an egg was coated in spiced meat, and that the dish made its way to England during the British colonization of India. However they got there, scotch eggs are right at home in British pubs. Ye olde snacks are sometimes the best.
[Image description: Four slices of Scotch egg on a white plate.] Credit & copyright: Alvis, Wikimedia Commons. The copyright holder of this work has released it into the public domain. This applies worldwide.They’re a staple across the pond, but the most likely place to find these eggs in the U.S. is at a Renaissance fair! Scotch eggs have been around for centuries, but have fallen out of favor in many of the places they were once popular. Associated with Britain yet seemingly named after Scotland, these sausage-covered snacks might actually have roots in India or Africa.
A Scotch egg is a hard-boiled or soft-boiled egg covered in sausage, then coated in breadcrumbs and deep fried. Home cooks sometimes choose to bake their Scotch eggs for convenience, and they can be served whole or cut into slices.
Scotch eggs are a popular pub food in the U.K., and in the U.S. they’re associated with historic Britain, making them popular at Renaissance faires and other European-themed events, but few other places. In truth, no one actually knows where Scotch eggs came from, though they definitely didn’t originate in Scotland, despite their name. One story claims that Scotch eggs were named after 19th-century restauranteurs William J Scott & Sons, of Whitby in Yorkshire, England. Supposedly, they served eggs called “Scotties”, coated in fish paste rather than sausage. There are plenty of other theories, of course. London department store Fortnum & Mason has long held that they invented Scotch eggs in the 18th century as a snack for wealthy customers. It’s also plausible that Scotch eggs aren’t European at all, but that they originated in Africa or India. African recipes for foods similar to Scotch eggs have been found, and might have been brought to England via trade or exploration during the reign of Queen Elizabeth I, between 1558 to 1603. It’s also possible that Scotch eggs were based on an Indian dish called nargisi kofta in which an egg was coated in spiced meat, and that the dish made its way to England during the British colonization of India. However they got there, scotch eggs are right at home in British pubs. Ye olde snacks are sometimes the best.
[Image description: Four slices of Scotch egg on a white plate.] Credit & copyright: Alvis, Wikimedia Commons. The copyright holder of this work has released it into the public domain. This applies worldwide.
August 21, 2025
-
FREEScience Nerdy CurioFree1 CQ
What do real estate planning and tree planting have in common? Both are all about location, location, location! It’s common knowledge that planting trees helps mitigate the effects of climate change, but a new study published in Nature by researchers at University of California, Riverside (UCR) shows that trees are actually more effective at helping in some locations than others. Trees can help lower temperatures in two ways: by reducing the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and sequestering it as biomass, and via a process called evapotranspiration, in which trees take water from the soil and release it as vapor. Evapotranspiration tends to have a greater impact on global temperatures because the process makes air more humid, which in turn leads to more clouds that reflect sunlight. The UCR researchers were looking into evapotranspiration’s effectiveness in different locations, and found that trees in the tropics, where the climate is warmer and more humid, are better at cooling the air. Using computer models, researchers compared the effects of additional trees planted globally to that of trees planted in the tropics. In the former, the mean cooling from the additional trees was 0.01 degrees Fahrenheit, and in the latter, the mean cooling was 0.1 degrees Fahrenheit. The effect could be even greater in more specific locations, with additional trees in central Africa reaching 0.8 degrees Fahrenheit of cooling. When accounting for the cooling effect of lowering atmospheric carbon, there was an additional 0.15 degrees Fahrenheit of difference. They also found that trees can reduce the risk of wildfires in grassy areas like savannas, since they’re more resistant to burning and limit the spread of fire. There are times that trees can raise ambient temperatures, though. In areas with snow, trees can absorb more heat than the surface around them due to their darker color, offsetting the effects of evapotranspiration. When it comes to cooling the atmosphere, green is usually (but not always) good.
[Image description: A dense tropical forest.] Credit & copyright: Gerda Arendt, Wikimedia Commons. This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.
What do real estate planning and tree planting have in common? Both are all about location, location, location! It’s common knowledge that planting trees helps mitigate the effects of climate change, but a new study published in Nature by researchers at University of California, Riverside (UCR) shows that trees are actually more effective at helping in some locations than others. Trees can help lower temperatures in two ways: by reducing the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and sequestering it as biomass, and via a process called evapotranspiration, in which trees take water from the soil and release it as vapor. Evapotranspiration tends to have a greater impact on global temperatures because the process makes air more humid, which in turn leads to more clouds that reflect sunlight. The UCR researchers were looking into evapotranspiration’s effectiveness in different locations, and found that trees in the tropics, where the climate is warmer and more humid, are better at cooling the air. Using computer models, researchers compared the effects of additional trees planted globally to that of trees planted in the tropics. In the former, the mean cooling from the additional trees was 0.01 degrees Fahrenheit, and in the latter, the mean cooling was 0.1 degrees Fahrenheit. The effect could be even greater in more specific locations, with additional trees in central Africa reaching 0.8 degrees Fahrenheit of cooling. When accounting for the cooling effect of lowering atmospheric carbon, there was an additional 0.15 degrees Fahrenheit of difference. They also found that trees can reduce the risk of wildfires in grassy areas like savannas, since they’re more resistant to burning and limit the spread of fire. There are times that trees can raise ambient temperatures, though. In areas with snow, trees can absorb more heat than the surface around them due to their darker color, offsetting the effects of evapotranspiration. When it comes to cooling the atmosphere, green is usually (but not always) good.
[Image description: A dense tropical forest.] Credit & copyright: Gerda Arendt, Wikimedia Commons. This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.
-
FREEPolitical Science Daily Curio #3138Free1 CQ
Washington D.C. doesn’t always get to be its own city, despite its status as the nation’s capital. With the federal government’s recent controversial takeover of law enforcement duties from the Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia (MPDC), it might be worth looking back at the history of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, which lies at the center of the debate.
Washington D.C. has been the capital of the U.S. since 1800, yet for most of its history it didn’t have much autonomy as a city. Even though it’s situated in the continental U.S., it’s not technically located in one of the 50 states. This was by design, as the Founding Fathers didn’t want any one state to have too much power over the capital. That power was instead given to the federal government, and that had some unusual repercussions for D.C. residents. For one, since the city wasn’t located in a state, the residents didn’t have a say in presidential elections with electoral votes until the 23rd amendment was ratified in 1961. Washington’s residents had been trying for most of its history to gain voting rights, and that was just one small victory in the city’s struggle for representation.
The next big development for Washington was the District of Columbia Home Rule Act of 1973, which allowed residents to vote for a mayor and a council of 12 members. Still, all legislation passed by the council has to be approved by Congress. Not only that, the city’s budget is set by Congress and its judges are appointed by the president. Finally, while Washington has representatives in Congress, they aren’t allowed to vote, effectively leaving the city without a voice in federal legislation. Recent events are a stark reminder that the city is ultimately at the mercy of federal authority for even the most basic municipal functions. With the White House invoking section 740 of the Home Rule Act to declare an emergency, the federal government has taken over law enforcement duties, and it has the power to do so for up to 30 days by notifying Congress. It might be the capital, but its rights are somewhat lowercase.
[Image description: An American flag with a wooden flagpole.] Credit & copyright: Crefollet, Wikimedia Commons. This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.Washington D.C. doesn’t always get to be its own city, despite its status as the nation’s capital. With the federal government’s recent controversial takeover of law enforcement duties from the Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia (MPDC), it might be worth looking back at the history of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, which lies at the center of the debate.
Washington D.C. has been the capital of the U.S. since 1800, yet for most of its history it didn’t have much autonomy as a city. Even though it’s situated in the continental U.S., it’s not technically located in one of the 50 states. This was by design, as the Founding Fathers didn’t want any one state to have too much power over the capital. That power was instead given to the federal government, and that had some unusual repercussions for D.C. residents. For one, since the city wasn’t located in a state, the residents didn’t have a say in presidential elections with electoral votes until the 23rd amendment was ratified in 1961. Washington’s residents had been trying for most of its history to gain voting rights, and that was just one small victory in the city’s struggle for representation.
The next big development for Washington was the District of Columbia Home Rule Act of 1973, which allowed residents to vote for a mayor and a council of 12 members. Still, all legislation passed by the council has to be approved by Congress. Not only that, the city’s budget is set by Congress and its judges are appointed by the president. Finally, while Washington has representatives in Congress, they aren’t allowed to vote, effectively leaving the city without a voice in federal legislation. Recent events are a stark reminder that the city is ultimately at the mercy of federal authority for even the most basic municipal functions. With the White House invoking section 740 of the Home Rule Act to declare an emergency, the federal government has taken over law enforcement duties, and it has the power to do so for up to 30 days by notifying Congress. It might be the capital, but its rights are somewhat lowercase.
[Image description: An American flag with a wooden flagpole.] Credit & copyright: Crefollet, Wikimedia Commons. This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.