Curio Cabinet
- By Date
- By Type
March 25, 2025
-
8 minFREEWork Business CurioFree5 CQ
From the BBC World Service: Chinese electric vehicle maker BYD has passed $100bn in annual revenue for the first time, putting Elon Musk’s Tesla in second pl...
From the BBC World Service: Chinese electric vehicle maker BYD has passed $100bn in annual revenue for the first time, putting Elon Musk’s Tesla in second pl...
-
2 minFREEHumanities Word CurioFree2 CQ
Word of the Day
: March 25, 2025\HAH-bit\ noun
What It Means
A hobbit is a member of a fictitious peaceful and friendly race of small humanli...
with Merriam-WebsterWord of the Day
: March 25, 2025\HAH-bit\ noun
What It Means
A hobbit is a member of a fictitious peaceful and friendly race of small humanli...
-
FREEMusic Appreciation Song CurioFree2 CQ
Sometimes hitmakers aren’t the ones to make a hit. As we remember British-American singer and record producer Scott Walker, who died this month in 2019, it’s worth thinking about how unlikely one of his biggest hits actually was. 1966’s The Sun Ain't Gonna Shine (Anymore) was originally written for Frankie Valli of Frankie Valli and the Four Seasons at the height of his popularity. It seemed destined that the song would be yet another hit for him; it was written by Bob Crewe and Bob Gaudio who had penned plenty of Valli’s other chart-toppers. Yet, Valli’s 1965 recording performed meagerly. It wasn’t until Scott Walker’s The Walker Brothers took a crack at it that the song finally rocketed to number one on the UK Singles Chart and number 13 on the U.S. Billboard Hot 100. For their version, the band utilized the “wall of sound” recording technique created by Phil Spector earlier that decade. The layered instrumentation and vocals created a deep, somber sound perfect for such a sad song, while Scott’s heartfelt vocals and signature low voice really drove the heartbreak home. Sometimes you have to crank up the sadness to move up the charts.
Sometimes hitmakers aren’t the ones to make a hit. As we remember British-American singer and record producer Scott Walker, who died this month in 2019, it’s worth thinking about how unlikely one of his biggest hits actually was. 1966’s The Sun Ain't Gonna Shine (Anymore) was originally written for Frankie Valli of Frankie Valli and the Four Seasons at the height of his popularity. It seemed destined that the song would be yet another hit for him; it was written by Bob Crewe and Bob Gaudio who had penned plenty of Valli’s other chart-toppers. Yet, Valli’s 1965 recording performed meagerly. It wasn’t until Scott Walker’s The Walker Brothers took a crack at it that the song finally rocketed to number one on the UK Singles Chart and number 13 on the U.S. Billboard Hot 100. For their version, the band utilized the “wall of sound” recording technique created by Phil Spector earlier that decade. The layered instrumentation and vocals created a deep, somber sound perfect for such a sad song, while Scott’s heartfelt vocals and signature low voice really drove the heartbreak home. Sometimes you have to crank up the sadness to move up the charts.
-
FREEHumanities Daily Curio #3052Free1 CQ
Who put the "art" in escape artist? Harry Houdini, of course! The Hungarian-American magician was born this month in 1874, and nearly a century after his untimely death, his name remains synonymous with the type of escape performances that he popularized. Yet, when he wasn’t wowing audiences, Houdini was a surprisingly grounded man. It might seem an unlikely role for a magician, but Houdini was a vocal skeptic in his time, especially as a spiritualist movement swept through America. This movement convinced many people that they could speak to dead loved ones, or pay someone to do so, but Houdini was having none of it.
Houdini started performing at an early age. By the time he was nine, he was part of a trapeze act. Starting from the age of 17, he adopted his stage name, Harry Houdini (his birth name was Ehrich Weisz) and started performing magic acts. As his career exploded around the turn of the century, Houdini became particularly famous for his escape acts. These death-defying stunts, in which Houdini was often chained underwater with seemingly no way out, seemed like magic when he managed to slip his bonds and survive. However, Houdini was a vocal critic of anyone who claimed to have true supernatural powers, especially spiritual mediums.
Houdini felt that, as a performer himself, he had a duty to expose the fraudulent practices rife in the spiritualism industry. His criticism reached the point of activism when he testified before Congress to call for the criminalization of fortune-telling and similar practices. Houdini's skepticism also led to public tensions with his longtime friend, Sherlock Holmes author Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. Doyle was a believer of spiritualism and regularly held seances with his wife, who claimed to be a medium herself. Sometime before he died, Houdini and his wife devised a way to prove to themselves whether mediumship was actually real. They created a coded message that they agreed to pass to each other from beyond the grave, should they ever truly be contacted. In the decade following Houdini’s death (at Halloween, no less), his wife held seances, challenging any medium to pass along their secret message. None succeeded, and on the 10th anniversary of his death, the widow announced to the world that her husband was unable to be reached. Even in death, Houdini was still putting on a show and keeping skepticism alive.
[Image description: Harry Houdini making a mysterious face with one hand raised near his cheek.] Credit & copyright: Library of Congress, 1925. This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published (or registered with the U.S. Copyright Office) before January 1, 1930.Who put the "art" in escape artist? Harry Houdini, of course! The Hungarian-American magician was born this month in 1874, and nearly a century after his untimely death, his name remains synonymous with the type of escape performances that he popularized. Yet, when he wasn’t wowing audiences, Houdini was a surprisingly grounded man. It might seem an unlikely role for a magician, but Houdini was a vocal skeptic in his time, especially as a spiritualist movement swept through America. This movement convinced many people that they could speak to dead loved ones, or pay someone to do so, but Houdini was having none of it.
Houdini started performing at an early age. By the time he was nine, he was part of a trapeze act. Starting from the age of 17, he adopted his stage name, Harry Houdini (his birth name was Ehrich Weisz) and started performing magic acts. As his career exploded around the turn of the century, Houdini became particularly famous for his escape acts. These death-defying stunts, in which Houdini was often chained underwater with seemingly no way out, seemed like magic when he managed to slip his bonds and survive. However, Houdini was a vocal critic of anyone who claimed to have true supernatural powers, especially spiritual mediums.
Houdini felt that, as a performer himself, he had a duty to expose the fraudulent practices rife in the spiritualism industry. His criticism reached the point of activism when he testified before Congress to call for the criminalization of fortune-telling and similar practices. Houdini's skepticism also led to public tensions with his longtime friend, Sherlock Holmes author Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. Doyle was a believer of spiritualism and regularly held seances with his wife, who claimed to be a medium herself. Sometime before he died, Houdini and his wife devised a way to prove to themselves whether mediumship was actually real. They created a coded message that they agreed to pass to each other from beyond the grave, should they ever truly be contacted. In the decade following Houdini’s death (at Halloween, no less), his wife held seances, challenging any medium to pass along their secret message. None succeeded, and on the 10th anniversary of his death, the widow announced to the world that her husband was unable to be reached. Even in death, Houdini was still putting on a show and keeping skepticism alive.
[Image description: Harry Houdini making a mysterious face with one hand raised near his cheek.] Credit & copyright: Library of Congress, 1925. This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published (or registered with the U.S. Copyright Office) before January 1, 1930.
March 24, 2025
-
FREESports Daily Curio #3051Free1 CQ
Bullfights without blood? It’s no bull! Legislators in Mexico City recently banned "violent" bullfighting. The controversial sport has existed for centuries in various forms; some cultures favored the practice of pitting bulls against bulls, while others had them face off against people. The most popular iteration of bullfighting comes from the Spanish tradition. It started as a sport in which human participants lanced bulls from horseback, but in the 18th century, Joaquín Rodríguez Costillares became one of the first professional matadors to bullfight on foot. He was also responsible for introducing much of the pomp and panache associated with modern bullfighting. Thanks to him, dramatic movements and flamboyant costumes became the norm for matadors.
While bullfighting remains popular in parts of Spain and many Spanish-speaking countries, it has its fair share of detractors. Every year, around 180,000 bulls are killed after bullfights, during which the animals are skewered with short spears. The recent bill in Mexico City, which passed 61 to 1, isn't the first time a ban on violent bullfighting has been tried. A previous ban in 2022 was overturned back in 2023, hailing the return of an industry that generates around $400 million a year and employs 80,000 in Mexico. However, the current ban may play out differently. The bill doesn't ban bullfighting outright, but allows for a less violent version of the sport in which matadors attempt to "skewer" the bulls using harmless poles against a Velcro pad attached to the animals’ backs. Still, the bill attracted fervent opposition from supporters of traditional bullfighting, many of whom consider the sport a point of national pride. Of course, while the bulls will be safer in this new version, the matadors won’t be any better protected. They’ll still have to remember that when you mess with the bull, you get the horns!
[Image description: A painting depicting two 18th century bullfights in a divided arena with a large crowd.] Credit & copyright: Bullfight in a Divided Ring, Attributed to Goya (Francisco de Goya y Lucientes) (Spanish, Fuendetodos 1746–1828 Bordeaux). The Metropolitan Museum of Art, Catharine Lorillard Wolfe Collection, Wolfe Fund, 1922. Public Domain.Bullfights without blood? It’s no bull! Legislators in Mexico City recently banned "violent" bullfighting. The controversial sport has existed for centuries in various forms; some cultures favored the practice of pitting bulls against bulls, while others had them face off against people. The most popular iteration of bullfighting comes from the Spanish tradition. It started as a sport in which human participants lanced bulls from horseback, but in the 18th century, Joaquín Rodríguez Costillares became one of the first professional matadors to bullfight on foot. He was also responsible for introducing much of the pomp and panache associated with modern bullfighting. Thanks to him, dramatic movements and flamboyant costumes became the norm for matadors.
While bullfighting remains popular in parts of Spain and many Spanish-speaking countries, it has its fair share of detractors. Every year, around 180,000 bulls are killed after bullfights, during which the animals are skewered with short spears. The recent bill in Mexico City, which passed 61 to 1, isn't the first time a ban on violent bullfighting has been tried. A previous ban in 2022 was overturned back in 2023, hailing the return of an industry that generates around $400 million a year and employs 80,000 in Mexico. However, the current ban may play out differently. The bill doesn't ban bullfighting outright, but allows for a less violent version of the sport in which matadors attempt to "skewer" the bulls using harmless poles against a Velcro pad attached to the animals’ backs. Still, the bill attracted fervent opposition from supporters of traditional bullfighting, many of whom consider the sport a point of national pride. Of course, while the bulls will be safer in this new version, the matadors won’t be any better protected. They’ll still have to remember that when you mess with the bull, you get the horns!
[Image description: A painting depicting two 18th century bullfights in a divided arena with a large crowd.] Credit & copyright: Bullfight in a Divided Ring, Attributed to Goya (Francisco de Goya y Lucientes) (Spanish, Fuendetodos 1746–1828 Bordeaux). The Metropolitan Museum of Art, Catharine Lorillard Wolfe Collection, Wolfe Fund, 1922. Public Domain. -
FREEArt Appreciation Art CurioFree1 CQ
How’d you like to have this baby in your parlor? Panel: Spring is a rug manufactured some time around 1715 by the Royal Savonnerie Manufactory, Chaillot Workshops in Paris, France. It’s extremely ornate, detailed with colors and images of spring. Near the bottom of the rug, goats and sheep mingle by an open basket and vase of flowers. Birds appear near the top of the design, along with a coat of arms. Gold borders and ornamentation surround the mostly light-blue, pastel-yellow, and white designs. The factory where this rug was produced could certainly boast about its work. After all, it supplied the royal palace with nearly all of its carpets, tapestries, and upholstery. Not everyone who bought these wares was royal, though. French aristocrats and noblemen, wanting to model their aesthetics after royal ones, commissioned their own housewares from the Royal Savonnerie. This rug, made with an impressive 144 symmetrical rug knots per square inch, is one example of a commissioned piece. It might not have adorned the palace, but making it was still surely a royal feat!
Panel: Spring, Royal Savonnerie Manufactory, Chaillot Workshops, c. 1715, Savonnerie knotted-pile; wool, hemp, 108 x 86.5 in. (274.3 x 219.7 cm.), The Cleveland Museum of Art, Cleveland, Ohio
[Image credit & copyright: Royal Savonnerie Manufactory, Chaillot Workshops. The Cleveland Museum of Art, John L. Severance Fund 1952.14, Public Domain, (CC0) designation.]How’d you like to have this baby in your parlor? Panel: Spring is a rug manufactured some time around 1715 by the Royal Savonnerie Manufactory, Chaillot Workshops in Paris, France. It’s extremely ornate, detailed with colors and images of spring. Near the bottom of the rug, goats and sheep mingle by an open basket and vase of flowers. Birds appear near the top of the design, along with a coat of arms. Gold borders and ornamentation surround the mostly light-blue, pastel-yellow, and white designs. The factory where this rug was produced could certainly boast about its work. After all, it supplied the royal palace with nearly all of its carpets, tapestries, and upholstery. Not everyone who bought these wares was royal, though. French aristocrats and noblemen, wanting to model their aesthetics after royal ones, commissioned their own housewares from the Royal Savonnerie. This rug, made with an impressive 144 symmetrical rug knots per square inch, is one example of a commissioned piece. It might not have adorned the palace, but making it was still surely a royal feat!
Panel: Spring, Royal Savonnerie Manufactory, Chaillot Workshops, c. 1715, Savonnerie knotted-pile; wool, hemp, 108 x 86.5 in. (274.3 x 219.7 cm.), The Cleveland Museum of Art, Cleveland, Ohio
[Image credit & copyright: Royal Savonnerie Manufactory, Chaillot Workshops. The Cleveland Museum of Art, John L. Severance Fund 1952.14, Public Domain, (CC0) designation.] -
8 minFREEWork Business CurioFree5 CQ
Current and former U.S. Agency for International Development workers are being allowed into USAID headquarters in Washington, D.C. for a second day today to ...
Current and former U.S. Agency for International Development workers are being allowed into USAID headquarters in Washington, D.C. for a second day today to ...
March 23, 2025
-
2 minFREEHumanities Word CurioFree2 CQ
Word of the Day
: March 23, 2025\duh-ree-GUR\ adjective
What It Means
De rigueur is a formal adjective that describes things that are necessa...
with Merriam-WebsterWord of the Day
: March 23, 2025\duh-ree-GUR\ adjective
What It Means
De rigueur is a formal adjective that describes things that are necessa...
-
7 minFREEWork Business CurioFree4 CQ
The second Trump administration is reportedly working on a plan to dramatically reduce the workforce at the Internal Revenue Service. As much as half of the ...
The second Trump administration is reportedly working on a plan to dramatically reduce the workforce at the Internal Revenue Service. As much as half of the ...
-
FREEUS History PP&T CurioFree1 CQ
This governor has the gift of gab. On this day in 1775, about a month before the American Revolution began in earnest, orator Patrick Henry uttered one of the most famous sentences in American history: “Give me liberty or give me death.” Or did he? There’s still some scholarly debate as to whether Henry actually said those iconic words, but there’s no doubt that his speeches stirred American imaginations.
Born on May 29, 1736, in Hanover County in the Colony of Virginia, Henry’s childhood put him on a good path for a future orator. His father, a Scottish immigrant, had been educated at King’s College, while his mother came from a wealthy local family. Since his family’s wealth would pass to Henry’s older brother rather than him, he couldn’t afford a life of leisure. He was educated at home by his father, and in his late teens tried to open and run a store with his brother, though it quickly failed. For a time he helped his father-in-law run a tavern in Hanover, before beginning at-home studies to become a lawyer. Henry already understood the power of words and the persuasive force of good oration. He’d grown up watching passionate preachers during the religious revival known as the Great Awakening, which helped drive him toward his new profession.
After earning his law license in 1760, Henry’s wit and speaking ability made him a quick success. His most important legal victory came in 1763, in the sentencing phase of a case known as the Parson’s Cause. Since tobacco was a major cash crop in Virginia, many Virginian officials received their annual pay in tobacco. When a series of droughts in the 1750s caused tobacco prices to rise from two cents per pound to three times that much, the Virginia legislature stepped in to stabilize things. They passed the Two-Penny Act, which set the price of tobacco used to pay contracts at the usual two cents per pound. Clergy in the Anglican Church, which was sponsored by the British government, didn’t want their revenue limited by the Two-Penny Act. So, they appealed to authorities in England, who sided with them, overruling the Two-Penny Act. With the power of England behind him, Reverend James Maury of Hanover County, Virginia, sued his own parish for backpay and won. All that was left was to decide exactly how much backpay Maury was owed. That’s where Patrick Henry came in. Arguing on behalf of the parish vestry, Henry gave a passionate speech about what he saw as the greed of church officials and the overreach of Britain. By overturning the Two-Penny Act, he argued, the British government was exerting tyrannical power over the people of Virginia. Though some in the courtroom accused Henry of treason, the jury sided with him, awarding Maury just one penny of backpay. The case made Henry so popular that it gained him 164 new clients within a year.
Now famous for his fiery speeches and resistance to British power, Henry was elected to the Virginia legislature’s lower chamber, the House of Burgesses, in 1765. In 1774, Henry became a delegate to the First Continental Congress. His most famous speech came the following year, at the Second Virginia Convention, where members debated whether to add language to Virginian governing documents stating that the British king could veto colonial legislation. Henry instead proposed amendments about raising an independent militia, since he believed that war with England was imminent. On March 23, he delivered a fiery address saying, “Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace but there is no peace. The war is actually begun!” After arguing in favor of his amendments in more detail, he ended with the famous line, “I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!”
In truth, we’ll never know if Henry actually uttered that famous sentence. His speech was never transcribed during his lifetime, but was pieced together from recollections of those present more than 10 years after his death. Regardless, we do know that Henry went on to become Virginia’s first governor in 1776, after the United States declared independence from England, and that he served until 1779. He was elected again in 1785, and served for two years. Though Henry is best remembered for a single speech, he made plenty of others, won plenty of legal cases, and served his newly-formed state and country in both peace and wartime. No one can say that he was all talk!
[Image description: A black-and-white illustration of Patrick Henry delivering his famous speech to other men at the Virginia Assembly. He has one hand raised, as do many of the audience members. On the ground is a paper reading “Proceedings of the Virginia Assembly.”] Credit & copyright: Published by Currier & Ives, c. 1876. Library of Congress. Public Domain.This governor has the gift of gab. On this day in 1775, about a month before the American Revolution began in earnest, orator Patrick Henry uttered one of the most famous sentences in American history: “Give me liberty or give me death.” Or did he? There’s still some scholarly debate as to whether Henry actually said those iconic words, but there’s no doubt that his speeches stirred American imaginations.
Born on May 29, 1736, in Hanover County in the Colony of Virginia, Henry’s childhood put him on a good path for a future orator. His father, a Scottish immigrant, had been educated at King’s College, while his mother came from a wealthy local family. Since his family’s wealth would pass to Henry’s older brother rather than him, he couldn’t afford a life of leisure. He was educated at home by his father, and in his late teens tried to open and run a store with his brother, though it quickly failed. For a time he helped his father-in-law run a tavern in Hanover, before beginning at-home studies to become a lawyer. Henry already understood the power of words and the persuasive force of good oration. He’d grown up watching passionate preachers during the religious revival known as the Great Awakening, which helped drive him toward his new profession.
After earning his law license in 1760, Henry’s wit and speaking ability made him a quick success. His most important legal victory came in 1763, in the sentencing phase of a case known as the Parson’s Cause. Since tobacco was a major cash crop in Virginia, many Virginian officials received their annual pay in tobacco. When a series of droughts in the 1750s caused tobacco prices to rise from two cents per pound to three times that much, the Virginia legislature stepped in to stabilize things. They passed the Two-Penny Act, which set the price of tobacco used to pay contracts at the usual two cents per pound. Clergy in the Anglican Church, which was sponsored by the British government, didn’t want their revenue limited by the Two-Penny Act. So, they appealed to authorities in England, who sided with them, overruling the Two-Penny Act. With the power of England behind him, Reverend James Maury of Hanover County, Virginia, sued his own parish for backpay and won. All that was left was to decide exactly how much backpay Maury was owed. That’s where Patrick Henry came in. Arguing on behalf of the parish vestry, Henry gave a passionate speech about what he saw as the greed of church officials and the overreach of Britain. By overturning the Two-Penny Act, he argued, the British government was exerting tyrannical power over the people of Virginia. Though some in the courtroom accused Henry of treason, the jury sided with him, awarding Maury just one penny of backpay. The case made Henry so popular that it gained him 164 new clients within a year.
Now famous for his fiery speeches and resistance to British power, Henry was elected to the Virginia legislature’s lower chamber, the House of Burgesses, in 1765. In 1774, Henry became a delegate to the First Continental Congress. His most famous speech came the following year, at the Second Virginia Convention, where members debated whether to add language to Virginian governing documents stating that the British king could veto colonial legislation. Henry instead proposed amendments about raising an independent militia, since he believed that war with England was imminent. On March 23, he delivered a fiery address saying, “Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace but there is no peace. The war is actually begun!” After arguing in favor of his amendments in more detail, he ended with the famous line, “I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!”
In truth, we’ll never know if Henry actually uttered that famous sentence. His speech was never transcribed during his lifetime, but was pieced together from recollections of those present more than 10 years after his death. Regardless, we do know that Henry went on to become Virginia’s first governor in 1776, after the United States declared independence from England, and that he served until 1779. He was elected again in 1785, and served for two years. Though Henry is best remembered for a single speech, he made plenty of others, won plenty of legal cases, and served his newly-formed state and country in both peace and wartime. No one can say that he was all talk!
[Image description: A black-and-white illustration of Patrick Henry delivering his famous speech to other men at the Virginia Assembly. He has one hand raised, as do many of the audience members. On the ground is a paper reading “Proceedings of the Virginia Assembly.”] Credit & copyright: Published by Currier & Ives, c. 1876. Library of Congress. Public Domain.
March 22, 2025
-
7 minFREEWork Business CurioFree4 CQ
From the BBC World Service: London’s Heathrow Airport will be closed Friday following a power outage; more than 1,300 flights face cancellation. The outage w...
From the BBC World Service: London’s Heathrow Airport will be closed Friday following a power outage; more than 1,300 flights face cancellation. The outage w...
-
FREESports Sporty CurioFree1 CQ
It’s not every day you see a stadium full of bananas. Recently, the Savannah Bananas sold out their first game in an NFL Stadium, playing for a crowd of 65,000 at Raymond James Stadium in Tampa, Florida. The stadium is usually the home of the Bay Buccaneers, but they were happy to turn over the spotlight for a night—it’s not every day you get to see such “bananas” antics on a baseball field, after all. The Savannah Bananas are an exhibition team, meaning that they don’t play traditional baseball, but a game that combines baseball, dancing, and acrobatics to entertain crowds. They call the game “banana ball.” Dressed in bright yellow kilts, players are often escorted onto the field by a pep band, or even carried atop banana-shaped pool floats. Players sometimes perform on stilts and participate in comedy sketches mid-game, and every game includes a choreographed dance number. As their name suggests, the Savannah Bananas got their start in Savannah, Georgia. They were the brainchild of husband and wife team Jesse and Emily Cole, who bought a Coastal Plain League team and moved it to Georgia in 2015. The team was in debt, and ticket sales stalled, at first. By 2016, the financial situation looked grim, but things changed when the public was allowed to vote on the new team’s name. When “Savannah Bananas” was chosen in a landslide, it drove home how important community involvement was, and the team’s exhibition games got more and more wacky, gaining a loyal following all the while. Fans of normal baseball needn’t worry, either—Savannah Bananas players know their way around the diamond. They’re all former standouts from college teams or former MLB draft picks, so they’ve got plenty of skill. No spotty peels in this stadium!
It’s not every day you see a stadium full of bananas. Recently, the Savannah Bananas sold out their first game in an NFL Stadium, playing for a crowd of 65,000 at Raymond James Stadium in Tampa, Florida. The stadium is usually the home of the Bay Buccaneers, but they were happy to turn over the spotlight for a night—it’s not every day you get to see such “bananas” antics on a baseball field, after all. The Savannah Bananas are an exhibition team, meaning that they don’t play traditional baseball, but a game that combines baseball, dancing, and acrobatics to entertain crowds. They call the game “banana ball.” Dressed in bright yellow kilts, players are often escorted onto the field by a pep band, or even carried atop banana-shaped pool floats. Players sometimes perform on stilts and participate in comedy sketches mid-game, and every game includes a choreographed dance number. As their name suggests, the Savannah Bananas got their start in Savannah, Georgia. They were the brainchild of husband and wife team Jesse and Emily Cole, who bought a Coastal Plain League team and moved it to Georgia in 2015. The team was in debt, and ticket sales stalled, at first. By 2016, the financial situation looked grim, but things changed when the public was allowed to vote on the new team’s name. When “Savannah Bananas” was chosen in a landslide, it drove home how important community involvement was, and the team’s exhibition games got more and more wacky, gaining a loyal following all the while. Fans of normal baseball needn’t worry, either—Savannah Bananas players know their way around the diamond. They’re all former standouts from college teams or former MLB draft picks, so they’ve got plenty of skill. No spotty peels in this stadium!
March 21, 2025
-
FREEMind + Body Daily CurioFree1 CQ
St. Patrick’s Day might be over, but it’s not too late to learn about this classic holiday dish. Corned beef, usually served with cabbage and potatoes, is considered a classic St. Patrick’s Day meal in the U.S., especially in places with large Irish-American populations, like New York City. There’s one place you won’t find many people eating corned beef on St. Patrick’s Day, though: Ireland. While corned beef does have roots on the Emerald Isle, its connection to the holiday began in the U.S.
Corned beef doesn’t actually contain corn. Rather, it’s a type of cured beef. “Corning” beef involves brining beef brisket in a solution of spices, sodium nitrite, and large-grain rock salt (the salt granules are roughly the size of corn kernels, hence the name). During the curing process, the sodium nitrite reacts with a protein in the beef called myoglobin, turning the meat pink. Corned beef is often served with cabbage, which is boiled in the same brine as the beef, and boiled potatoes.
To understand why the Irish don’t eat much corned beef today, it’s important to look at their history with beef in general. Before the British began taking over large swaths of Ireland in the 12th century, pork was the most commonly eaten meat in Ireland. The Irish did raise cows, but they were used mainly for milk and for plowing. The Gaels, one of Ireland’s native peoples, even considered cows sacred, and wouldn’t eat beef unless the cows were too old to work or produce milk. As England took greater control of Ireland, culminating in a complete takeover in the mid-17th century, the country’s culinary landscape changed.
Beef became big business in Ireland, with many Irish cows being exported to England. This rankled beef farmers living in England, though, and to protect their businesses, the Cattle Acts of 1663 and 1667 made it illegal for Ireland to export any more beef to England. Ireland was therefore stuck with a surplus of cows. The solution? Corned beef. Since the process of salting meat kills harmful bacteria, the process has been used since the beginning of human history to keep stored meat edible for long periods. Since Ireland had a much lower salt tax than England, they had access to higher-quality salt, and thus corned beef became a major Irish export. However, because of England’s legal and economic oppression of Irish Catholics, most Irish people couldn’t actually afford to eat beef.
In 1845, during Ireland's Great Famine, more than a million Irish immigrants came to the U.S., forming communities in major cities. For the first time, they could actually afford to eat beef…though not the most expensive, fresh cuts. Instead, they opted for corned beef, exported from their own native country. The practice of serving corned beef with cabbage and potatoes actually comes from Jewish culinary tradition, which mixed with Irish tradition in U.S. cities. Back in Ireland, St. Patrick’s Day had been a quiet, religious holiday. But Irish immigrants turned it into a celebration of Irish culture, including Irish food. Thus, corned beef became a holiday staple. In the U.S., it remains so to this day, while back in Ireland, pork has gone back to being the most popular meat. Hey, a new home means new traditions.
[Image description: A plate of corned beef, cabbage, and small, whole potatoes. ] Credit & copyright: A1stopshop, Wikimedia Commons. The copyright holder of this work, has released it into the public domain. This applies worldwide.St. Patrick’s Day might be over, but it’s not too late to learn about this classic holiday dish. Corned beef, usually served with cabbage and potatoes, is considered a classic St. Patrick’s Day meal in the U.S., especially in places with large Irish-American populations, like New York City. There’s one place you won’t find many people eating corned beef on St. Patrick’s Day, though: Ireland. While corned beef does have roots on the Emerald Isle, its connection to the holiday began in the U.S.
Corned beef doesn’t actually contain corn. Rather, it’s a type of cured beef. “Corning” beef involves brining beef brisket in a solution of spices, sodium nitrite, and large-grain rock salt (the salt granules are roughly the size of corn kernels, hence the name). During the curing process, the sodium nitrite reacts with a protein in the beef called myoglobin, turning the meat pink. Corned beef is often served with cabbage, which is boiled in the same brine as the beef, and boiled potatoes.
To understand why the Irish don’t eat much corned beef today, it’s important to look at their history with beef in general. Before the British began taking over large swaths of Ireland in the 12th century, pork was the most commonly eaten meat in Ireland. The Irish did raise cows, but they were used mainly for milk and for plowing. The Gaels, one of Ireland’s native peoples, even considered cows sacred, and wouldn’t eat beef unless the cows were too old to work or produce milk. As England took greater control of Ireland, culminating in a complete takeover in the mid-17th century, the country’s culinary landscape changed.
Beef became big business in Ireland, with many Irish cows being exported to England. This rankled beef farmers living in England, though, and to protect their businesses, the Cattle Acts of 1663 and 1667 made it illegal for Ireland to export any more beef to England. Ireland was therefore stuck with a surplus of cows. The solution? Corned beef. Since the process of salting meat kills harmful bacteria, the process has been used since the beginning of human history to keep stored meat edible for long periods. Since Ireland had a much lower salt tax than England, they had access to higher-quality salt, and thus corned beef became a major Irish export. However, because of England’s legal and economic oppression of Irish Catholics, most Irish people couldn’t actually afford to eat beef.
In 1845, during Ireland's Great Famine, more than a million Irish immigrants came to the U.S., forming communities in major cities. For the first time, they could actually afford to eat beef…though not the most expensive, fresh cuts. Instead, they opted for corned beef, exported from their own native country. The practice of serving corned beef with cabbage and potatoes actually comes from Jewish culinary tradition, which mixed with Irish tradition in U.S. cities. Back in Ireland, St. Patrick’s Day had been a quiet, religious holiday. But Irish immigrants turned it into a celebration of Irish culture, including Irish food. Thus, corned beef became a holiday staple. In the U.S., it remains so to this day, while back in Ireland, pork has gone back to being the most popular meat. Hey, a new home means new traditions.
[Image description: A plate of corned beef, cabbage, and small, whole potatoes. ] Credit & copyright: A1stopshop, Wikimedia Commons. The copyright holder of this work, has released it into the public domain. This applies worldwide.
March 20, 2025
-
8 minFREEWork Business CurioFree5 CQ
From the BBC World Service: Fears of a trade war ramp up as tariffs go into effect on Chinese, Mexican and Canadian imports to the U.S., with more planned fo...
From the BBC World Service: Fears of a trade war ramp up as tariffs go into effect on Chinese, Mexican and Canadian imports to the U.S., with more planned fo...
-
2 minFREEHumanities Word CurioFree2 CQ
Word of the Day
: March 4, 2025\SHAH-dun-froy-duh\ noun
What It Means
Schadenfreude refers to a feeling of enjoyment that comes from seeing o...
with Merriam-WebsterWord of the Day
: March 4, 2025\SHAH-dun-froy-duh\ noun
What It Means
Schadenfreude refers to a feeling of enjoyment that comes from seeing o...
-
FREEChemistry Nerdy CurioFree1 CQ
It’s dangerous, it’s all around us, and it’s fueled by sunlight. No, it’s not a horror movie monster, it’s nitrous oxide (N2O), a greenhouse gas that’s more potent than the more frequently-discussed carbon dioxide (CO2). According to a new study, it’s being produced at greater rates than previously thought, via a reaction we weren’t aware of. Greenhouse gases, like N2O, gather in Earth’s atmosphere and trap heat, steadily warming the planet. Gases’ molecular structures determine how effective they are at trapping heat, and although N2O only makes up around six percent of greenhouse gas emissions, it’s about 300 times more insulating than CO2, which makes up around 82 percent. Until now, it was thought that N2O was mainly produced by bacteria as a byproduct when the bacteria broke down certain nitrogen compounds. Researchers from Denmark and Spain challenged that notion when they published findings in the journal Science describing an abiotic, or non-biological, reaction that produces more N2O than biological ones. The process, called photochemodenitrification, still isn’t fully understood at the chemical level. However, by placing water samples in quartz vials, removing all biological matter from the samples, and then exposing them to sunlight, researchers proved that nitrite in surface water reacts with ultraviolet radiation to produce N2O. While this might seem like bad news, understanding the mechanisms by which greenhouse gases enter our atmosphere can be a first step toward reducing their emissions. You can’t solve a problem if you don’t know it’s happening, after all.
[Image description: Clouds and a glowing sun at sunset.] Credit & copyright: Loc Dang, Pexels
It’s dangerous, it’s all around us, and it’s fueled by sunlight. No, it’s not a horror movie monster, it’s nitrous oxide (N2O), a greenhouse gas that’s more potent than the more frequently-discussed carbon dioxide (CO2). According to a new study, it’s being produced at greater rates than previously thought, via a reaction we weren’t aware of. Greenhouse gases, like N2O, gather in Earth’s atmosphere and trap heat, steadily warming the planet. Gases’ molecular structures determine how effective they are at trapping heat, and although N2O only makes up around six percent of greenhouse gas emissions, it’s about 300 times more insulating than CO2, which makes up around 82 percent. Until now, it was thought that N2O was mainly produced by bacteria as a byproduct when the bacteria broke down certain nitrogen compounds. Researchers from Denmark and Spain challenged that notion when they published findings in the journal Science describing an abiotic, or non-biological, reaction that produces more N2O than biological ones. The process, called photochemodenitrification, still isn’t fully understood at the chemical level. However, by placing water samples in quartz vials, removing all biological matter from the samples, and then exposing them to sunlight, researchers proved that nitrite in surface water reacts with ultraviolet radiation to produce N2O. While this might seem like bad news, understanding the mechanisms by which greenhouse gases enter our atmosphere can be a first step toward reducing their emissions. You can’t solve a problem if you don’t know it’s happening, after all.
[Image description: Clouds and a glowing sun at sunset.] Credit & copyright: Loc Dang, Pexels
-
FREEBiology Daily Curio #3050Free1 CQ
Modern medicine wouldn’t be half as modern without one woman’s critical work. Born on this day in 1879, Canadian physician and biochemist Maud Leonora Menten forever changed her fields of research. In doing so, she opened the door for the development of new, lifesaving medical therapies that we still benefit from today.
Born in Port Lambton, Ontario, Canada, Menten earned her medical doctorate degree at the University of Toronto, at a time when almost no women worked as scientists or physicians. In fact, she was one of the first women in Canadian history to earn the degree. After graduation, Menten’s ambitions immediately clashed with the rules of 19th-century Canadian society, as women weren’t usually permitted to participate in scientific research there. Undeterred, Menten took a ship across the Atlantic to Germany in 1912, despite fears from friends and family about the safety of the journey (after all, the Titanic had sunk earlier that year).
In Germany, Menten began working with biochemist Leonor Michaelis. They studied enzyme reactions, which were not well understood at the time. Enzymes are proteins that speed up chemical reactions, like metabolism, in the body. Enzymes act upon specific molecules called substrates during these reactions. For example, the enzyme amylase acts upon starch. Together, Menten and Michaelis developed an equation explaining that enzyme reaction rates are proportional to and depend upon how much substrate is available to them. Known as the Michaelis-Menten equation, this breakthrough laid the groundwork for an entire new field of study, known as enzyme kinetics. The equation is still taught in biochemistry classes today, and because it helped researchers understand how drugs are metabolized in the body, many modern medicines wouldn’t exist without it.
From Germany, Menten journeyed to the U.S. where she obtained her PhD in biochemistry from the University of Chicago. After continuing her medical research in the U.S. for a time, she joined the faculty at the University of Pittsburgh’s School of Medicine. Over time, she became a treasured member of the Pittsburgh community, and the head of pathology at the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh. She retired in 1950. At a time when social and legal barriers kept women from being able to study, let alone practice science, Menten studied it, earned degrees in it, broke new ground in its practice, and ultimately taught it to others. There are some pioneers you just can’t keep down.
[Image description: Four varying glass measuring containers filled with brightly colored liquids.] Credit & copyright: Kindel Media, PexelsModern medicine wouldn’t be half as modern without one woman’s critical work. Born on this day in 1879, Canadian physician and biochemist Maud Leonora Menten forever changed her fields of research. In doing so, she opened the door for the development of new, lifesaving medical therapies that we still benefit from today.
Born in Port Lambton, Ontario, Canada, Menten earned her medical doctorate degree at the University of Toronto, at a time when almost no women worked as scientists or physicians. In fact, she was one of the first women in Canadian history to earn the degree. After graduation, Menten’s ambitions immediately clashed with the rules of 19th-century Canadian society, as women weren’t usually permitted to participate in scientific research there. Undeterred, Menten took a ship across the Atlantic to Germany in 1912, despite fears from friends and family about the safety of the journey (after all, the Titanic had sunk earlier that year).
In Germany, Menten began working with biochemist Leonor Michaelis. They studied enzyme reactions, which were not well understood at the time. Enzymes are proteins that speed up chemical reactions, like metabolism, in the body. Enzymes act upon specific molecules called substrates during these reactions. For example, the enzyme amylase acts upon starch. Together, Menten and Michaelis developed an equation explaining that enzyme reaction rates are proportional to and depend upon how much substrate is available to them. Known as the Michaelis-Menten equation, this breakthrough laid the groundwork for an entire new field of study, known as enzyme kinetics. The equation is still taught in biochemistry classes today, and because it helped researchers understand how drugs are metabolized in the body, many modern medicines wouldn’t exist without it.
From Germany, Menten journeyed to the U.S. where she obtained her PhD in biochemistry from the University of Chicago. After continuing her medical research in the U.S. for a time, she joined the faculty at the University of Pittsburgh’s School of Medicine. Over time, she became a treasured member of the Pittsburgh community, and the head of pathology at the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh. She retired in 1950. At a time when social and legal barriers kept women from being able to study, let alone practice science, Menten studied it, earned degrees in it, broke new ground in its practice, and ultimately taught it to others. There are some pioneers you just can’t keep down.
[Image description: Four varying glass measuring containers filled with brightly colored liquids.] Credit & copyright: Kindel Media, Pexels
March 19, 2025
-
FREEBiology Nerdy CurioFree1 CQ
Whoa there, wombat! One of Australia’s most beloved marsupials is making international headlines for all the wrong reasons after an American influencer recently picked up a wild baby wombat without permission. Things aren’t all negative, though. It seems likely that the wombat was reunited with its mother, the influencer has issued an apology, and people around the world are suddenly eager to learn more about these adorable, chunky creatures.
Wombats are marsupials, or mammals that give birth to partially-developed young who finish their development in a pouch. Wombats are famous for their stalky, bear-like bodies featuring short limbs, stubby tails, and short muzzles. There are three species of wombat, all native to Australia. The most populous species is the bare-nosed wombat, also known as the common wombat. Adults are around 4 feet long, but their compact bodies are dense, so they can weigh up to 88 pounds. This makes them the third-largest marsupials alive today, though they can claim an even prouder lineage when it comes to size. The extinct Diprotodon, sometimes referred to as the “giant wombat”, was the largest marsupial to ever live, and it shared a common ancestor with both modern wombats and koalas.
While Northern and Southern hairy-nosed wombats live in groups of up to 15 individuals, common wombats are usually solitary once they reach adulthood. They spend much of their time digging and maintaining burrows in which to hide from the harsh Australian sun. With their powerful legs and long claws, wombats are excellent diggers; their burrows can be up to 100 feet long. Digging is so important to wombats that their pouches actually face backwards, so that they don’t fill up with dirt as they dig. Wombats are nocturnal, and they spend their nights grazing on grass and small plants. Adult wombats don’t have to worry too much about predators, thanks to their large size, but young wombats, called joeys, are vulnerable to birds of prey and dingoes, among other creatures.
Unfortunately, humans pose the biggest threat to wild wombats. Habitat destruction threatens all three species, and the Northern hairy-nosed wombat is critically endangered, having nearly gone extinct by the 1980s due to overhunting. Their population is more stable today, but all wombats are still protected in Australia, as part of conservation efforts. So don’t pick them up, even if they do look like teddy bears!
[Image description: A black-and-white illustration of five wombats foraging and lying on the ground.] Credit & copyright: The Wombat, from "Le Magasin Pittoresque", Charles Jacque (French, Paris 1813–1894 Paris). The Metropolitan Museum of Art, Harris Brisbane Dick Fund, 1933. Public Domain.Whoa there, wombat! One of Australia’s most beloved marsupials is making international headlines for all the wrong reasons after an American influencer recently picked up a wild baby wombat without permission. Things aren’t all negative, though. It seems likely that the wombat was reunited with its mother, the influencer has issued an apology, and people around the world are suddenly eager to learn more about these adorable, chunky creatures.
Wombats are marsupials, or mammals that give birth to partially-developed young who finish their development in a pouch. Wombats are famous for their stalky, bear-like bodies featuring short limbs, stubby tails, and short muzzles. There are three species of wombat, all native to Australia. The most populous species is the bare-nosed wombat, also known as the common wombat. Adults are around 4 feet long, but their compact bodies are dense, so they can weigh up to 88 pounds. This makes them the third-largest marsupials alive today, though they can claim an even prouder lineage when it comes to size. The extinct Diprotodon, sometimes referred to as the “giant wombat”, was the largest marsupial to ever live, and it shared a common ancestor with both modern wombats and koalas.
While Northern and Southern hairy-nosed wombats live in groups of up to 15 individuals, common wombats are usually solitary once they reach adulthood. They spend much of their time digging and maintaining burrows in which to hide from the harsh Australian sun. With their powerful legs and long claws, wombats are excellent diggers; their burrows can be up to 100 feet long. Digging is so important to wombats that their pouches actually face backwards, so that they don’t fill up with dirt as they dig. Wombats are nocturnal, and they spend their nights grazing on grass and small plants. Adult wombats don’t have to worry too much about predators, thanks to their large size, but young wombats, called joeys, are vulnerable to birds of prey and dingoes, among other creatures.
Unfortunately, humans pose the biggest threat to wild wombats. Habitat destruction threatens all three species, and the Northern hairy-nosed wombat is critically endangered, having nearly gone extinct by the 1980s due to overhunting. Their population is more stable today, but all wombats are still protected in Australia, as part of conservation efforts. So don’t pick them up, even if they do look like teddy bears!
[Image description: A black-and-white illustration of five wombats foraging and lying on the ground.] Credit & copyright: The Wombat, from "Le Magasin Pittoresque", Charles Jacque (French, Paris 1813–1894 Paris). The Metropolitan Museum of Art, Harris Brisbane Dick Fund, 1933. Public Domain. -
FREEPhysical Therapy Daily Curio #3049Free1 CQ
Feeling achy? Break out the nature documentaries. A recent study conducted by researchers from the University of Exeter and University of Vienna found that people experiencing pain felt better when viewing scenes from nature—even if those scenes were shown to them via a screen.
The study used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fRMI) to look at the brain activity of 49 volunteers in real time. The volunteers were given a series of small electric shocks while watching and listening to different types of scenes on a screen. These included a scene of an office, a city, and a lake surrounded by trees. While watching nature scenes, participants reported feeling less pain. Their brain imaging also showed a decrease in nociception, the process by which the body senses pain.
This surprisingly powerful result could be due to something called attention restoration theory, a psychological theory that spending time in nature improves overall cognitive function and naturally captures human attention. If a person suffering from low-grade pain is able to focus on something else, they’re less likely to feel the pain as intensely. Now, it seems that simply looking at nature is enough to achieve a similar effect as actually being outside. While pain medication is, of course, still needed to treat severe pain, it’s always useful for medical professionals and the general public to expand their knowledge of medication-free pain relief methods. After all, nature videos are almost always a click away these days, making them a uniquely accessible form of therapy. Previous research has also shown that viewing nature has other beneficial physical effects, such as lowering levels of cortisol, the body’s main stress hormone. Time to follow some nature accounts on social media!
[Image description: A spruce forest in Sweden. Tall trees are visible with greenery on the forest floor.] Credit & copyright: W.carter, Wikimedia Commons. This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.Feeling achy? Break out the nature documentaries. A recent study conducted by researchers from the University of Exeter and University of Vienna found that people experiencing pain felt better when viewing scenes from nature—even if those scenes were shown to them via a screen.
The study used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fRMI) to look at the brain activity of 49 volunteers in real time. The volunteers were given a series of small electric shocks while watching and listening to different types of scenes on a screen. These included a scene of an office, a city, and a lake surrounded by trees. While watching nature scenes, participants reported feeling less pain. Their brain imaging also showed a decrease in nociception, the process by which the body senses pain.
This surprisingly powerful result could be due to something called attention restoration theory, a psychological theory that spending time in nature improves overall cognitive function and naturally captures human attention. If a person suffering from low-grade pain is able to focus on something else, they’re less likely to feel the pain as intensely. Now, it seems that simply looking at nature is enough to achieve a similar effect as actually being outside. While pain medication is, of course, still needed to treat severe pain, it’s always useful for medical professionals and the general public to expand their knowledge of medication-free pain relief methods. After all, nature videos are almost always a click away these days, making them a uniquely accessible form of therapy. Previous research has also shown that viewing nature has other beneficial physical effects, such as lowering levels of cortisol, the body’s main stress hormone. Time to follow some nature accounts on social media!
[Image description: A spruce forest in Sweden. Tall trees are visible with greenery on the forest floor.] Credit & copyright: W.carter, Wikimedia Commons. This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.