Curio Cabinet
- By Date
- By Type
April 21, 2025
-
FREEArt Appreciation Art CurioFree1 CQ
Holy cow...well, actually, holy bull. Apis was a bull deity in ancient Egypt that was associated with many different concepts, from fertility and grain production to death and the underworld. The piece above is a stone figurine of a bull with a broken disc on its head. The stone is green and the surface contains etched designs. While many Egyptian gods, which began to be worshipped around 5,000 years ago, were believed to take on the forms of animals, Apis only took on the form of a bull. Apis grew to be strongly associated with Ptah, a creator deity worshipped in Memphis. Black bulls with white, triangular markings on their heads were said to be favorites of Apis, and some of these “Apis bulls” were even given servants and lived lives of luxury in Egypt. In a ritual called The Running of Apis, the bulls were let loose in Memphis’s temple precinct, and their running symbolized fertilizing the land. When an Apis bull died, it was given an opulent burial and all of Egypt mourned. Don't try to take this bull by the horns, lest you incur the wrath of the gods.
Apis Bull, 400–100 BCE, Serpentinite, 20.87 x 7.5 x 23.25 in. (53 x 19 x 59 cm.), The Cleveland Museum of Art, Cleveland, Ohio.
[Image credit & copyright: The Cleveland Museum of Art, Leonard C. Hanna Jr. Fund 1969.118, Public Domain Creative Commons Zero (CC0) designation.]Holy cow...well, actually, holy bull. Apis was a bull deity in ancient Egypt that was associated with many different concepts, from fertility and grain production to death and the underworld. The piece above is a stone figurine of a bull with a broken disc on its head. The stone is green and the surface contains etched designs. While many Egyptian gods, which began to be worshipped around 5,000 years ago, were believed to take on the forms of animals, Apis only took on the form of a bull. Apis grew to be strongly associated with Ptah, a creator deity worshipped in Memphis. Black bulls with white, triangular markings on their heads were said to be favorites of Apis, and some of these “Apis bulls” were even given servants and lived lives of luxury in Egypt. In a ritual called The Running of Apis, the bulls were let loose in Memphis’s temple precinct, and their running symbolized fertilizing the land. When an Apis bull died, it was given an opulent burial and all of Egypt mourned. Don't try to take this bull by the horns, lest you incur the wrath of the gods.
Apis Bull, 400–100 BCE, Serpentinite, 20.87 x 7.5 x 23.25 in. (53 x 19 x 59 cm.), The Cleveland Museum of Art, Cleveland, Ohio.
[Image credit & copyright: The Cleveland Museum of Art, Leonard C. Hanna Jr. Fund 1969.118, Public Domain Creative Commons Zero (CC0) designation.] -
7 minFREEWork Business CurioFree4 CQ
Yesterday, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell took a wait-and-see posture on interest rates amid market disruptions and increased talk of recession linked t...
Yesterday, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell took a wait-and-see posture on interest rates amid market disruptions and increased talk of recession linked t...
-
FREEUS History Daily Curio #3067Free1 CQ
San Francisco is no stranger to earthquakes, but this one was a particular doozy. This month in 1906, the City by the Bay was devastated and permanently reshaped by what would come to be known as the Great 1906 San Francisco Earthquake. On the morning of April 18, 1906, at 5:12 AM, many San Francisco residents were woken up by foreshocks, smaller earthquakes that can occur hours to minutes ahead of a larger one. Just 20 seconds or so later, an earthquake with a magnitude of 7.9 hit the city in earnest, shaking the ground for a full minute. The epicenter of the earthquake was at San Andreas fault, where 296 miles of the northern portion ruptured, sending out a destructive quake that could be felt as far north as Oregon and as far south as Los Angeles. The earthquake was so powerful that buildings toppled and streets were torn apart, but that was only part of the event’s destructive power. There's a reason that it's sometimes called the Great San Francisco Earthquake and Fire. The ensuing flames, caused by burst gas pipes and upended stoves, caused almost as much damage as the earthquake itself. Over the course of four days, 28,000 buildings in 500 blocks were reduced to rubble and ash. It was around $350 million worth of damage, but the loss of property paled in comparison to the loss of life. An estimated 3,000 people died in the earthquake and around 250,000 people were left homeless in its aftermath. The disaster had just one silver lining: geologic observations of the fault and a survey of the devastation proved to be a massive help in understanding how earthquakes cause damage, and the city was quickly rebuilt to be more earthquake and fire-resistant. No matter what, though, the real fault lies with the fault.
[Image description: A black-and-white photo of San Fransisco after the 1906 earthquake, with many ruined buildings.] Credit & copyright: National Archives Catalog. Photographer: Chadwick, H. D. (U.S. Gov War Department. Office of the Chief Signal Officer.) Images Collected by Brigadier General Adolphus W. Greely, Chief Signal Officer (1887-1906), between 1865–1935. Unrestricted Access, Unrestricted Use, Public Domain.San Francisco is no stranger to earthquakes, but this one was a particular doozy. This month in 1906, the City by the Bay was devastated and permanently reshaped by what would come to be known as the Great 1906 San Francisco Earthquake. On the morning of April 18, 1906, at 5:12 AM, many San Francisco residents were woken up by foreshocks, smaller earthquakes that can occur hours to minutes ahead of a larger one. Just 20 seconds or so later, an earthquake with a magnitude of 7.9 hit the city in earnest, shaking the ground for a full minute. The epicenter of the earthquake was at San Andreas fault, where 296 miles of the northern portion ruptured, sending out a destructive quake that could be felt as far north as Oregon and as far south as Los Angeles. The earthquake was so powerful that buildings toppled and streets were torn apart, but that was only part of the event’s destructive power. There's a reason that it's sometimes called the Great San Francisco Earthquake and Fire. The ensuing flames, caused by burst gas pipes and upended stoves, caused almost as much damage as the earthquake itself. Over the course of four days, 28,000 buildings in 500 blocks were reduced to rubble and ash. It was around $350 million worth of damage, but the loss of property paled in comparison to the loss of life. An estimated 3,000 people died in the earthquake and around 250,000 people were left homeless in its aftermath. The disaster had just one silver lining: geologic observations of the fault and a survey of the devastation proved to be a massive help in understanding how earthquakes cause damage, and the city was quickly rebuilt to be more earthquake and fire-resistant. No matter what, though, the real fault lies with the fault.
[Image description: A black-and-white photo of San Fransisco after the 1906 earthquake, with many ruined buildings.] Credit & copyright: National Archives Catalog. Photographer: Chadwick, H. D. (U.S. Gov War Department. Office of the Chief Signal Officer.) Images Collected by Brigadier General Adolphus W. Greely, Chief Signal Officer (1887-1906), between 1865–1935. Unrestricted Access, Unrestricted Use, Public Domain.
April 20, 2025
-
8 minFREEWork Business CurioFree5 CQ
The American Revolutionary War began 250 years ago Saturday. You probably know the political reasons behind the American colonists' fight for independence, b...
The American Revolutionary War began 250 years ago Saturday. You probably know the political reasons behind the American colonists' fight for independence, b...
-
FREEPolitical Science PP&T CurioFree1 CQ
Tariffs, duties, customs—no matter what you call them, they can be a volatile tool capable of protecting weak industries or bleeding an economy dry. As much as tariffs have been in the news lately, they can be difficult to understand. Luckily, one can always turn to history to see how they’ve been used in the past. In the early days of the U.S., tariffs helped domestic industries stay competitive. However, they can easily turn harmful if they’re implemented without due consideration.
A tariff is a tax applied to goods that are imported or exported, though the latter is rarely used nowadays. Tariffs on exports were sometimes used to safeguard limited resources from leaving the country, but when the word "tariff" is used, it almost always means a tax applied to imports. Tariffs are paid by the entity importing the goods, and they can be either “ad valorem” or "specific" tariffs. Ad valorem tariffs are based on a percentage of the value of the goods being taxed, while specific tariffs are fixed amounts, regardless of the total value. It's easy to think that tariffs are categorically detrimental, but there’s sometimes a good reason for them. Making certain types of imported goods more expensive might help domestic producers of those goods stay more competitive by allowing them to sell their goods at lower prices. On the other hand, poorly-conceived tariffs can end up raising the prices of goods across the board, putting economic pressure on consumers without helping domestic industries. Tariffs used to be much more common around the world, but as international trade grew throughout the 20th century, they became less and less so. In the U.S., at least, many factors led to tariffs’ decline.
In 1789, the Tariff Act was one of the first major pieces of legislation passed by Congress, and it created a massive source of revenue for the fledgling nation. Tariffs helped domestic industries gain their footing by leveling the playing field against their better-established foreign competitors, particularly in Britain. By the beginning of the Civil War, tariffs accounted for around 90 percent of the U.S. government’s revenue. As Americans took up arms against each other, however, there was a sudden, dire need for other sources of government funding. Other taxes were introduced, leading to tariffs becoming less significant. Still, even immediately after the war, tariffs accounted for around 50 percent of the nation's revenue. During the Great Depression, tariffs caused more problems than they solved. The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930 was intended to bolster domestic industries, but it also made it less feasible for those industries to export goods, hindering their overall business. By the start of World War II, the U.S. government simply could not rely on tariffs as a significant source of revenue any longer. Social security, the New Deal, and exponentially growing military expenditure among other things created mountains of expenses far too large for tariffs to cover. Thus, tariffs became less popular and less relevant over the decades.
Today, tariffs are typically used as negotiation tools between countries engaged in trade. Generally, tariffs are applied on specific industries or goods. For example, tariffs on steel have been used a number of times in recent history to aid American producers. However, the tariffs making the news as of late are unusual. Instead of targeting specific industries, tariffs are being applied across the board against entire countries, even on goods from established trade partners like Canada and Mexico. Only time will tell how this will impact U.S. consumers and U.S. industries. It’ll be historic no matter what…but that doesn’t always mean it will be smooth sailing.
[Image description: A U.S. flag with a wooden pole.] Credit & copyright: Crefollet, Wikimedia Commons. This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.Tariffs, duties, customs—no matter what you call them, they can be a volatile tool capable of protecting weak industries or bleeding an economy dry. As much as tariffs have been in the news lately, they can be difficult to understand. Luckily, one can always turn to history to see how they’ve been used in the past. In the early days of the U.S., tariffs helped domestic industries stay competitive. However, they can easily turn harmful if they’re implemented without due consideration.
A tariff is a tax applied to goods that are imported or exported, though the latter is rarely used nowadays. Tariffs on exports were sometimes used to safeguard limited resources from leaving the country, but when the word "tariff" is used, it almost always means a tax applied to imports. Tariffs are paid by the entity importing the goods, and they can be either “ad valorem” or "specific" tariffs. Ad valorem tariffs are based on a percentage of the value of the goods being taxed, while specific tariffs are fixed amounts, regardless of the total value. It's easy to think that tariffs are categorically detrimental, but there’s sometimes a good reason for them. Making certain types of imported goods more expensive might help domestic producers of those goods stay more competitive by allowing them to sell their goods at lower prices. On the other hand, poorly-conceived tariffs can end up raising the prices of goods across the board, putting economic pressure on consumers without helping domestic industries. Tariffs used to be much more common around the world, but as international trade grew throughout the 20th century, they became less and less so. In the U.S., at least, many factors led to tariffs’ decline.
In 1789, the Tariff Act was one of the first major pieces of legislation passed by Congress, and it created a massive source of revenue for the fledgling nation. Tariffs helped domestic industries gain their footing by leveling the playing field against their better-established foreign competitors, particularly in Britain. By the beginning of the Civil War, tariffs accounted for around 90 percent of the U.S. government’s revenue. As Americans took up arms against each other, however, there was a sudden, dire need for other sources of government funding. Other taxes were introduced, leading to tariffs becoming less significant. Still, even immediately after the war, tariffs accounted for around 50 percent of the nation's revenue. During the Great Depression, tariffs caused more problems than they solved. The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930 was intended to bolster domestic industries, but it also made it less feasible for those industries to export goods, hindering their overall business. By the start of World War II, the U.S. government simply could not rely on tariffs as a significant source of revenue any longer. Social security, the New Deal, and exponentially growing military expenditure among other things created mountains of expenses far too large for tariffs to cover. Thus, tariffs became less popular and less relevant over the decades.
Today, tariffs are typically used as negotiation tools between countries engaged in trade. Generally, tariffs are applied on specific industries or goods. For example, tariffs on steel have been used a number of times in recent history to aid American producers. However, the tariffs making the news as of late are unusual. Instead of targeting specific industries, tariffs are being applied across the board against entire countries, even on goods from established trade partners like Canada and Mexico. Only time will tell how this will impact U.S. consumers and U.S. industries. It’ll be historic no matter what…but that doesn’t always mean it will be smooth sailing.
[Image description: A U.S. flag with a wooden pole.] Credit & copyright: Crefollet, Wikimedia Commons. This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.
April 19, 2025
-
2 minFREEHumanities Word CurioFree2 CQ
Word of the Day
: April 19, 2025\fass-TID-ee-us\ adjective
What It Means
Someone described as fastidious is extremely or overly careful about...
with Merriam-WebsterWord of the Day
: April 19, 2025\fass-TID-ee-us\ adjective
What It Means
Someone described as fastidious is extremely or overly careful about...
-
FREEGolf Sporty CurioFree1 CQ
Finally, a chance to don green on the green! On April 13th, Northern Irish golfer Rory Daniel McIlroy won the Masters Tournament and was awarded his green jacket, the traditional prize. It was a nail-biting win, as McIlroy faced off against British golfer Justin Rose in a sudden-death playoff. The suspense was intensified by the fact that McIlroy had been famously close to winning the Masters several times before, starting in 2011. That year, he entered the tournament’s final round with a four-stroke lead, but shot a triple-bogey on the tenth hole, followed by more bogeys that left him unable to recover. He made it to the Tournament’s top ten in 2014, finished solo-fourth in 2015, and claimed 10th place in 2016. In 2018, he ended up finishing in a tie for fifth place despite tying his then-personal-best score. In 2022, he came tantalizingly close to winning, but ended up in second place. After failing to make the top ten in 2024, McIlroy came out literally and figuratively swinging at the 2025 tournament. Though he began the tournament’s final day with a five-shot lead, it had disappeared by the 18th hole. That’s when McIlroy hit his ball just four feet from the cup, setting up a sudden-death playoff against Rose that McIlroy ultimately won. Winners are required to pass their jackets on to the next winner after a year...but maybe McIlroy should be allowed to hold on to his just a tad longer? He's earned it!
Finally, a chance to don green on the green! On April 13th, Northern Irish golfer Rory Daniel McIlroy won the Masters Tournament and was awarded his green jacket, the traditional prize. It was a nail-biting win, as McIlroy faced off against British golfer Justin Rose in a sudden-death playoff. The suspense was intensified by the fact that McIlroy had been famously close to winning the Masters several times before, starting in 2011. That year, he entered the tournament’s final round with a four-stroke lead, but shot a triple-bogey on the tenth hole, followed by more bogeys that left him unable to recover. He made it to the Tournament’s top ten in 2014, finished solo-fourth in 2015, and claimed 10th place in 2016. In 2018, he ended up finishing in a tie for fifth place despite tying his then-personal-best score. In 2022, he came tantalizingly close to winning, but ended up in second place. After failing to make the top ten in 2024, McIlroy came out literally and figuratively swinging at the 2025 tournament. Though he began the tournament’s final day with a five-shot lead, it had disappeared by the 18th hole. That’s when McIlroy hit his ball just four feet from the cup, setting up a sudden-death playoff against Rose that McIlroy ultimately won. Winners are required to pass their jackets on to the next winner after a year...but maybe McIlroy should be allowed to hold on to his just a tad longer? He's earned it!
-
9 minFREEWork Business CurioFree5 CQ
It's the law that insurance companies have to cover the costs of certain screenings for cancer, diabetes, infectious diseases and more. Patients could soon h...
It's the law that insurance companies have to cover the costs of certain screenings for cancer, diabetes, infectious diseases and more. Patients could soon h...
April 18, 2025
-
8 minFREEWork Business CurioFree5 CQ
From the BBC World Service: Ukraine says it has signed a memorandum of intent on a minerals deal with the United States after negotiations in Washington. Plu...
From the BBC World Service: Ukraine says it has signed a memorandum of intent on a minerals deal with the United States after negotiations in Washington. Plu...
-
2 minFREEHumanities Word CurioFree2 CQ
Word of the Day
: April 18, 2025\kuh-LAB-uh-rayt\ verb
What It Means
To collaborate is to work with another person or group in order to do or...
with Merriam-WebsterWord of the Day
: April 18, 2025\kuh-LAB-uh-rayt\ verb
What It Means
To collaborate is to work with another person or group in order to do or...
-
FREEMind + Body Daily CurioFree1 CQ
Fire up the grill, backyard barbeque season is nearly upon us! In many places in the U.S., no outdoor get-together is complete without a scoop of Boston baked beans. This famous side’s sweet flavor sets itself apart from other baked beans. Its origins, though, are anything but sweet.
Like other kinds of baked beans, Boston baked beans are made by boiling beans (usually white common beans or navy beans) and then baking them in sauce. The sauce for Boston baked beans is sweetened with molasses and brown sugar, but also has a savory edge since bacon or salt pork is often added.
Boston baked beans are responsible for giving their titular city the nickname “Beantown.” In the years leading up to and directly following the Revolutionary War, Boston boasted more molasses than any other American city, but Bostonians didn’t produce it themselves. The city’s coastal position made it a major hub of the Triangle Trade between the Americas, Europe, and Africa. In this brutal trade, Europe shipped goods to Africa, which were traded for enslaved people, who were shipped to the Americas to farm and produce goods like cotton and rum, which were then shipped to Europe. Boston’s molasses was produced by enslaved people on sugar plantations in the Caribbean, then used in Boston to produce rum as part of the Triangle Trade. Leftover molasses became a common household item in Boston, and was used to create many New England foods that are still famous today, from molasses cookies to Boston baked beans.
In the late 19th century, large food companies began using new, industrial technology to mass produce and can goods. This included foods that were only famous in specific regions, like Boston baked beans. Once they were shipped across the country, Boston baked beans became instantly popular outside of New England. Today, most baked beans on grocery shelves are sweet and syrupy, even if they don’t call themselves Boston baked beans. If you get popular enough, your name sometimes dissolves into the sauce of the general culture.
[Image description: A white bowl filled with baked beans and sliced hot dogs.] Credit & copyright: Thomson200, Wikimedia Commons. This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.Fire up the grill, backyard barbeque season is nearly upon us! In many places in the U.S., no outdoor get-together is complete without a scoop of Boston baked beans. This famous side’s sweet flavor sets itself apart from other baked beans. Its origins, though, are anything but sweet.
Like other kinds of baked beans, Boston baked beans are made by boiling beans (usually white common beans or navy beans) and then baking them in sauce. The sauce for Boston baked beans is sweetened with molasses and brown sugar, but also has a savory edge since bacon or salt pork is often added.
Boston baked beans are responsible for giving their titular city the nickname “Beantown.” In the years leading up to and directly following the Revolutionary War, Boston boasted more molasses than any other American city, but Bostonians didn’t produce it themselves. The city’s coastal position made it a major hub of the Triangle Trade between the Americas, Europe, and Africa. In this brutal trade, Europe shipped goods to Africa, which were traded for enslaved people, who were shipped to the Americas to farm and produce goods like cotton and rum, which were then shipped to Europe. Boston’s molasses was produced by enslaved people on sugar plantations in the Caribbean, then used in Boston to produce rum as part of the Triangle Trade. Leftover molasses became a common household item in Boston, and was used to create many New England foods that are still famous today, from molasses cookies to Boston baked beans.
In the late 19th century, large food companies began using new, industrial technology to mass produce and can goods. This included foods that were only famous in specific regions, like Boston baked beans. Once they were shipped across the country, Boston baked beans became instantly popular outside of New England. Today, most baked beans on grocery shelves are sweet and syrupy, even if they don’t call themselves Boston baked beans. If you get popular enough, your name sometimes dissolves into the sauce of the general culture.
[Image description: A white bowl filled with baked beans and sliced hot dogs.] Credit & copyright: Thomson200, Wikimedia Commons. This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.
April 17, 2025
-
8 minFREEWork Business CurioFree5 CQ
California, the union's largest state for manufacturing, says the executive branch lacks the constitutional authority to enact tariffs. The lawsuit is the mo...
California, the union's largest state for manufacturing, says the executive branch lacks the constitutional authority to enact tariffs. The lawsuit is the mo...
-
FREEScience Nerdy CurioFree1 CQ
Your memories are your own business…for now. The ability to read minds and delete memories has always been relegated to the world of science fiction, but as we learn more about how memories are formed, we’re also learning how they might be strengthened, weakened, or even erased. Until the mid-20th century, little was known about how memories were actually formed. Then, in the 1940s and 50s, American-Canadian neurosurgeon Wilder Penfield performed a series of experiments in which he stimulated patients’ brains with electrical currents while they were conscious. He discovered that memories could be evoked by targeting different parts of the cortex with electricity. This research helped lead to the discovery that memories are formed via connections between neurons. These connections are created when a person has a memorable experience, and can be strengthened naturally by repeating similar experiences or by talking out loud about past experiences. They can also be strengthened artificially, as discovered by neuroscientist Robert Hampson, of North Carolina’s Wake Forest University School of Medicine. Using electricity, his team found a way to replicate neuron signals associated with specific images in an image-based memory test. When volunteers received electrical stimulation to their brains that mimicked those signals, their performance on the test improved by 35 to 40 percent. Of course, it stands to reason that if certain neural pathways weaken over time, then memories will also weaken, or fade away completely—and if memories can be artificially strengthened, they might be able to be artificially weakened too. The simplest way to do this might be to interfere with the memory-making process as it’s happening. Research has shown that neural connections are facilitated by molecules in the brain. Blocking these molecules during memory formation could cause the memory to go “unrecorded.” It’s possible that, one day, selectively removing molecules in certain areas could allow specific memories to be deleted…but right now, that’s still a long way off. While memory-strengthening treatments could one day lead to better treatments for dementia and Alzheimer's, memory-weakening technology could help those with traumatic memories or PTSD. Surely everyone has a few embarrassing teenage memories that they wouldn't mind losing too.
[Image description: A computer illustration of a gray brain against a black background.] Credit & copyright: KATRIN BOLOVTSOVA, Pexels
Your memories are your own business…for now. The ability to read minds and delete memories has always been relegated to the world of science fiction, but as we learn more about how memories are formed, we’re also learning how they might be strengthened, weakened, or even erased. Until the mid-20th century, little was known about how memories were actually formed. Then, in the 1940s and 50s, American-Canadian neurosurgeon Wilder Penfield performed a series of experiments in which he stimulated patients’ brains with electrical currents while they were conscious. He discovered that memories could be evoked by targeting different parts of the cortex with electricity. This research helped lead to the discovery that memories are formed via connections between neurons. These connections are created when a person has a memorable experience, and can be strengthened naturally by repeating similar experiences or by talking out loud about past experiences. They can also be strengthened artificially, as discovered by neuroscientist Robert Hampson, of North Carolina’s Wake Forest University School of Medicine. Using electricity, his team found a way to replicate neuron signals associated with specific images in an image-based memory test. When volunteers received electrical stimulation to their brains that mimicked those signals, their performance on the test improved by 35 to 40 percent. Of course, it stands to reason that if certain neural pathways weaken over time, then memories will also weaken, or fade away completely—and if memories can be artificially strengthened, they might be able to be artificially weakened too. The simplest way to do this might be to interfere with the memory-making process as it’s happening. Research has shown that neural connections are facilitated by molecules in the brain. Blocking these molecules during memory formation could cause the memory to go “unrecorded.” It’s possible that, one day, selectively removing molecules in certain areas could allow specific memories to be deleted…but right now, that’s still a long way off. While memory-strengthening treatments could one day lead to better treatments for dementia and Alzheimer's, memory-weakening technology could help those with traumatic memories or PTSD. Surely everyone has a few embarrassing teenage memories that they wouldn't mind losing too.
[Image description: A computer illustration of a gray brain against a black background.] Credit & copyright: KATRIN BOLOVTSOVA, Pexels
-
FREEScience Daily Curio #3066Free1 CQ
"Don't you wish there was more plastic at the beach?", said no one ever. Those perturbed by plastic pollution in Australia now have a reason to rejoice, as new research shows that coastal plastic waste levels there have dropped by nearly 40 percent since 2013. In Australia, as in many places, most waste found on beaches (around 75 percent) is plastic. This waste is unsightly, hazardous to people (especially children), and potentially deadly for wildlife. It's good news, then, that researchers in Australia are finding less and less of the stuff every year. According to CSIRO, Australia's national science agency, there has been a 39 percent reduction in plastic waste found in coastal areas. Researchers examined a number of different Australian locales, including Hobart in Tasmania, Newcastle in New South Wales, Perth in Western Australia, Port Augusta in South Australia, Sunshine Coast in Queensland, and Alice Springs in the Northern Territory. They didn't just look at beaches by the sea, either. Areas surveyed included inland, riverine, and coastal habitats, and all were found to have reduced plastic waste. Moreover, there was a 16 percent increase in areas that were completely free of plastic waste. CSIRO researchers also identified the most common types of plastic waste: polystyrene and cigarette butts, which accounted for 24 percent and 20 percent. Other common forms of waste included beverage containers (bottles and cans) and food wrappers, as well as plenty of unspecified plastic fragments. This type of research has allowed for more focused efforts when it comes to waste collection and prevention, but CSIRO isn't ready to rest on their laurels just yet. They hope to achieve an 80 percent reduction of plastic waste by 2030 by identifying sources of waste and better understanding how it enters the environment. Australia's National Waste Policy also aims to recycle or reuse all plastic waste by 2040. As they say: waste not, want not.
[Image description: The surface of water under a sky at sunset.] Credit & copyright: Matt Hardy, Pexels"Don't you wish there was more plastic at the beach?", said no one ever. Those perturbed by plastic pollution in Australia now have a reason to rejoice, as new research shows that coastal plastic waste levels there have dropped by nearly 40 percent since 2013. In Australia, as in many places, most waste found on beaches (around 75 percent) is plastic. This waste is unsightly, hazardous to people (especially children), and potentially deadly for wildlife. It's good news, then, that researchers in Australia are finding less and less of the stuff every year. According to CSIRO, Australia's national science agency, there has been a 39 percent reduction in plastic waste found in coastal areas. Researchers examined a number of different Australian locales, including Hobart in Tasmania, Newcastle in New South Wales, Perth in Western Australia, Port Augusta in South Australia, Sunshine Coast in Queensland, and Alice Springs in the Northern Territory. They didn't just look at beaches by the sea, either. Areas surveyed included inland, riverine, and coastal habitats, and all were found to have reduced plastic waste. Moreover, there was a 16 percent increase in areas that were completely free of plastic waste. CSIRO researchers also identified the most common types of plastic waste: polystyrene and cigarette butts, which accounted for 24 percent and 20 percent. Other common forms of waste included beverage containers (bottles and cans) and food wrappers, as well as plenty of unspecified plastic fragments. This type of research has allowed for more focused efforts when it comes to waste collection and prevention, but CSIRO isn't ready to rest on their laurels just yet. They hope to achieve an 80 percent reduction of plastic waste by 2030 by identifying sources of waste and better understanding how it enters the environment. Australia's National Waste Policy also aims to recycle or reuse all plastic waste by 2040. As they say: waste not, want not.
[Image description: The surface of water under a sky at sunset.] Credit & copyright: Matt Hardy, Pexels
April 16, 2025
-
10 minFREEWork Business CurioFree6 CQ
From wildfires in California to more recent flooding in the Midwest and South, the toll of recovering from natural disasters can be staggering. Sen. Tim Shee...
From wildfires in California to more recent flooding in the Midwest and South, the toll of recovering from natural disasters can be staggering. Sen. Tim Shee...
-
2 minFREEHumanities Word CurioFree2 CQ
Word of the Day
: April 16, 2025\ad-VER-suh-tee\ noun
What It Means
Adversity refers to a difficult situation or condition, or to a state of ...
with Merriam-WebsterWord of the Day
: April 16, 2025\ad-VER-suh-tee\ noun
What It Means
Adversity refers to a difficult situation or condition, or to a state of ...
-
FREEBiology Nerdy CurioFree1 CQ
No more jumping through hoops for these pachyderms. Washington state recently passed a bill banning the use of exotic animals in traveling shows, including circuses. Along with lions, tigers, monkeys, and bears, elephants are expected to benefit greatly from the legislation. Because they’re smaller and more docile than their African cousins, Asian elephants have long been used (and, unfortunately, often abused) in European and American circuses. In their native habitat, however, Asian elephants have traditionally been revered by people and are even symbols of royalty in some countries. Still, they’re extremely endangered in the wild, with only around 30,000 to 50,000 wild individuals left.
Asian elephants are native to South and Southeast Asia, where they're the largest mammals on the continent. They usually stand between 6 and 12 feet tall, and males can weigh up to 13,000 pounds. Asian elephants are versatile, able to live in dense tropical forests or on open grasslands. For females, survival depends on cooperation with herd members. Females and young males live in herds of around seven individuals, with the oldest female acting as the leader, or matriarch. The matriarch is responsible for leading the herd to areas with enough food to sustain them. She also leads them on their yearly migration during the dry season, using her age and experience to ensure that they find water. Herd living allows female Asian elephants to protect themselves and their calves from tigers, their only wild predators. As for male Asian elephants, they leave their herds when they reach around eight years of age, and live mostly solitary lives, only interacting with other elephants during mating season, which coincides with the rainy season from around June to October.
Asian elephants might be smaller than African elephants, but both species share a common ancestor, though that ancestor didn’t look much like either modern species. Moeritherium lived in northern Africa around 37 to 50 million years ago, and looked more like a pig, hippo, or tapir than an elephant. Yet, all species in the family Elephantidae, including the extinct wooly mammoth, are distantly related to it. When some elephant ancestors made their way to Asia around six million years ago, Asian and African elephants officially diverged, and began to become their own species. They still have plenty in common, though, including their endangered status. Humans are the greatest threat facing both species. Habitat loss and poaching could drive Asian elephants to extinction in just a few years if nothing is done. Size just isn’t enough to protect against people.
[Image description: A close-up photo of a male Asian elephant with its mouth open.] Credit & copyright: LadyofHats, Wikimedia Commons. The copyright holder of this work, has released it into the public domain. This applies worldwide.No more jumping through hoops for these pachyderms. Washington state recently passed a bill banning the use of exotic animals in traveling shows, including circuses. Along with lions, tigers, monkeys, and bears, elephants are expected to benefit greatly from the legislation. Because they’re smaller and more docile than their African cousins, Asian elephants have long been used (and, unfortunately, often abused) in European and American circuses. In their native habitat, however, Asian elephants have traditionally been revered by people and are even symbols of royalty in some countries. Still, they’re extremely endangered in the wild, with only around 30,000 to 50,000 wild individuals left.
Asian elephants are native to South and Southeast Asia, where they're the largest mammals on the continent. They usually stand between 6 and 12 feet tall, and males can weigh up to 13,000 pounds. Asian elephants are versatile, able to live in dense tropical forests or on open grasslands. For females, survival depends on cooperation with herd members. Females and young males live in herds of around seven individuals, with the oldest female acting as the leader, or matriarch. The matriarch is responsible for leading the herd to areas with enough food to sustain them. She also leads them on their yearly migration during the dry season, using her age and experience to ensure that they find water. Herd living allows female Asian elephants to protect themselves and their calves from tigers, their only wild predators. As for male Asian elephants, they leave their herds when they reach around eight years of age, and live mostly solitary lives, only interacting with other elephants during mating season, which coincides with the rainy season from around June to October.
Asian elephants might be smaller than African elephants, but both species share a common ancestor, though that ancestor didn’t look much like either modern species. Moeritherium lived in northern Africa around 37 to 50 million years ago, and looked more like a pig, hippo, or tapir than an elephant. Yet, all species in the family Elephantidae, including the extinct wooly mammoth, are distantly related to it. When some elephant ancestors made their way to Asia around six million years ago, Asian and African elephants officially diverged, and began to become their own species. They still have plenty in common, though, including their endangered status. Humans are the greatest threat facing both species. Habitat loss and poaching could drive Asian elephants to extinction in just a few years if nothing is done. Size just isn’t enough to protect against people.
[Image description: A close-up photo of a male Asian elephant with its mouth open.] Credit & copyright: LadyofHats, Wikimedia Commons. The copyright holder of this work, has released it into the public domain. This applies worldwide. -
FREEParenting Daily Curio #3065Free1 CQ
Are middle children really mediators? Are older children really the most responsible? Is there any truth to common stereotypes about birth-order? A new study shows that a person's place among their siblings can affect their personality, but there's more to it. When a family has three or more children, conventional wisdom says that the eldest will be bold and independent, the middle child will be the peacemaker, and the youngest will be the most easygoing (because they’re able to get away with everything). Obviously, these archetypes don't always hold true, but birth order can contribute to someone's personality in surprising ways. Researchers in Canada conducted a large-scale study using the HEXACO framework, which measures six general traits—Honesty-Humility, Emotionality, Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, and Openness to Experience. Using data from almost 800,000 participants from various English-speaking countries, the researchers deciphered how birth order affects personalities.
When it came to Honesty-Humility and Agreeableness, second or middle children scored the highest, followed by the youngest and then the eldest. Those with no siblings scored the lowest of all, but they did redeem themselves somewhat. Compared to those who have siblings, "only children" scored higher when it came to openness to experience and tended to have higher levels of intellectual curiosity. Overall, researchers found that those who came from larger families tended to be more cooperative and modest compared to those from smaller families, likely from having to share more resources and settle disputes. That's not to say that birth order is the end-all-be-all when it comes to determining personalities. In fact, researchers pointed out that these statistical differences are small, albeit consistent. They also noted that cultural differences might yield different results, and they hope to launch similar studies in non-English speaking countries. Of course, there's probably no culture on Earth without sibling rivalry.
[Image description: Three dark red hearts on a pink background.] Credit & copyright: Author-created image. Public Domain.Are middle children really mediators? Are older children really the most responsible? Is there any truth to common stereotypes about birth-order? A new study shows that a person's place among their siblings can affect their personality, but there's more to it. When a family has three or more children, conventional wisdom says that the eldest will be bold and independent, the middle child will be the peacemaker, and the youngest will be the most easygoing (because they’re able to get away with everything). Obviously, these archetypes don't always hold true, but birth order can contribute to someone's personality in surprising ways. Researchers in Canada conducted a large-scale study using the HEXACO framework, which measures six general traits—Honesty-Humility, Emotionality, Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, and Openness to Experience. Using data from almost 800,000 participants from various English-speaking countries, the researchers deciphered how birth order affects personalities.
When it came to Honesty-Humility and Agreeableness, second or middle children scored the highest, followed by the youngest and then the eldest. Those with no siblings scored the lowest of all, but they did redeem themselves somewhat. Compared to those who have siblings, "only children" scored higher when it came to openness to experience and tended to have higher levels of intellectual curiosity. Overall, researchers found that those who came from larger families tended to be more cooperative and modest compared to those from smaller families, likely from having to share more resources and settle disputes. That's not to say that birth order is the end-all-be-all when it comes to determining personalities. In fact, researchers pointed out that these statistical differences are small, albeit consistent. They also noted that cultural differences might yield different results, and they hope to launch similar studies in non-English speaking countries. Of course, there's probably no culture on Earth without sibling rivalry.
[Image description: Three dark red hearts on a pink background.] Credit & copyright: Author-created image. Public Domain.
April 15, 2025
-
7 minFREEWork Business CurioFree4 CQ
From the BBC World Service: Chinese President Xi Jinping is continuing his weeklong tour of Southeast Asia. He arrives in Malaysia tonight — a country that h...
From the BBC World Service: Chinese President Xi Jinping is continuing his weeklong tour of Southeast Asia. He arrives in Malaysia tonight — a country that h...
-
1 minFREEHumanities Word CurioFree1 CQ
Word of the Day
: April 15, 2025\pug-NAY-shus\ adjective
What It Means
Someone described as pugnacious shows a readiness or desire to fight o...
with Merriam-WebsterWord of the Day
: April 15, 2025\pug-NAY-shus\ adjective
What It Means
Someone described as pugnacious shows a readiness or desire to fight o...
-
FREEEngineering Daily Curio #3064Free1 CQ
Chewing gum? Did you bring enough to share with everyone? Most chewing gums can only freshen your breath, but a new antiviral gum developed by researchers at the School of Dental Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania can fight the influenza virus and the herpes simplex virus (HSV). Influenza claims up to 650,000 lives per year, and while HSV isn't as deadly, the infection never goes away. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), around 3.8 billion people under 50 are infected with herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), while around 520 million people between the ages of 15 and 49 are infected with herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2). HSV-1 is responsible for most cases of oral herpes, while HSV-2 is responsible for most cases of genital herpes. HSV-1 doesn't claim as many lives as influenza, but it's still the leading cause of infectious blindness in Western countries. Both influenza and HSV infections can go unnoticed or misdiagnosed, and in the case of HSV, many people can be asymptomatic for long periods of time.
Managing the spread of these diseases is a seemingly sisyphean task, but the antiviral gum from the University of Pennsylvania might make that uphill climb a little easier. The special ingredient in the gum is lablab beans, which are full of an antiviral trap protein (FRIL) that ensnares viruses in the human body and stops them from replicating. Studies show that chewing on the gum can lower viral loads by 95 percent, significantly reducing the likelihood of transmission. Delivering the treatment via gum isn’t just a cute gimmick, either. Prolonged chewing releases the FRIL from the bean gum consistently over time, increasing its effectiveness. The question remains, though, should the flavor be spearmint or something fruity?
[Image description: A piece of chewed gum in a foil wrapper.] Credit & copyright: ToTheDemosToTheStars, Wikimedia Commons. This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.Chewing gum? Did you bring enough to share with everyone? Most chewing gums can only freshen your breath, but a new antiviral gum developed by researchers at the School of Dental Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania can fight the influenza virus and the herpes simplex virus (HSV). Influenza claims up to 650,000 lives per year, and while HSV isn't as deadly, the infection never goes away. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), around 3.8 billion people under 50 are infected with herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), while around 520 million people between the ages of 15 and 49 are infected with herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2). HSV-1 is responsible for most cases of oral herpes, while HSV-2 is responsible for most cases of genital herpes. HSV-1 doesn't claim as many lives as influenza, but it's still the leading cause of infectious blindness in Western countries. Both influenza and HSV infections can go unnoticed or misdiagnosed, and in the case of HSV, many people can be asymptomatic for long periods of time.
Managing the spread of these diseases is a seemingly sisyphean task, but the antiviral gum from the University of Pennsylvania might make that uphill climb a little easier. The special ingredient in the gum is lablab beans, which are full of an antiviral trap protein (FRIL) that ensnares viruses in the human body and stops them from replicating. Studies show that chewing on the gum can lower viral loads by 95 percent, significantly reducing the likelihood of transmission. Delivering the treatment via gum isn’t just a cute gimmick, either. Prolonged chewing releases the FRIL from the bean gum consistently over time, increasing its effectiveness. The question remains, though, should the flavor be spearmint or something fruity?
[Image description: A piece of chewed gum in a foil wrapper.] Credit & copyright: ToTheDemosToTheStars, Wikimedia Commons. This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.