Curio Cabinet
- By Date
- By Type
June 12, 2025
-
9 minFREEWork Business CurioFree5 CQ
Many labor unions were once wary of immigrants, viewing them as low-cost competitors for union jobs. Now, changing demographics and common interests have res...
Many labor unions were once wary of immigrants, viewing them as low-cost competitors for union jobs. Now, changing demographics and common interests have res...
-
FREEScience Nerdy CurioFree1 CQ
They may be small, but they’re a big deal. Scientists at the Rosenstiel School of Marine, Atmospheric, and Earth Science have published a study in the journal Nature npj Viruses, detailing a slew of newly-discovered giant viruses that shape ocean life. While the ocean is vast and home to some of Earth’s largest creatures, the base of the food web still consists of its smallest denizens, including algae, amoeba, and flagellates (microscopic organisms defined by their single, whip-like tail that is used for movement). These organisms are greatly affected by giant viruses, which, as their name implies, are much larger than most viruses, with some even being larger than bacteria. Such viruses can cause havoc in the delicate balance of the ocean’s food web. Among other things, they can cause algal blooms, which can be directly harmful to animal and human health.
As significant as their ecological role is, giant viruses were poorly understood until recently, and little was known about their genome. To learn more, the researchers pored over existing marine metagenomic datasets and were able to identify 230 novel giant viruses, along with 530 new proteins. Some of these proteins were found to be linked to the viruses’ ability to manipulate the process of photosynthesis in their hosts, possibly explaining how they lead to algal blooms. In fact, figuring out how to deal with algal blooms was one of the motivations for the research. One of the study’s co-authors, Mohammad Moniruzzaman, explained, "By better understanding the diversity and role of giant viruses in the ocean and how they interact with algae and other ocean microbes, we can predict and possibly manage harmful algal blooms, which are human health hazards in Florida as well as all over the world.” Even some of Earth’s biggest problems are caused by small things.[Image description: A digital illustration of green viruses against a blue background.] Credit & copyright: Author-created illustration. Public Domain.
They may be small, but they’re a big deal. Scientists at the Rosenstiel School of Marine, Atmospheric, and Earth Science have published a study in the journal Nature npj Viruses, detailing a slew of newly-discovered giant viruses that shape ocean life. While the ocean is vast and home to some of Earth’s largest creatures, the base of the food web still consists of its smallest denizens, including algae, amoeba, and flagellates (microscopic organisms defined by their single, whip-like tail that is used for movement). These organisms are greatly affected by giant viruses, which, as their name implies, are much larger than most viruses, with some even being larger than bacteria. Such viruses can cause havoc in the delicate balance of the ocean’s food web. Among other things, they can cause algal blooms, which can be directly harmful to animal and human health.
As significant as their ecological role is, giant viruses were poorly understood until recently, and little was known about their genome. To learn more, the researchers pored over existing marine metagenomic datasets and were able to identify 230 novel giant viruses, along with 530 new proteins. Some of these proteins were found to be linked to the viruses’ ability to manipulate the process of photosynthesis in their hosts, possibly explaining how they lead to algal blooms. In fact, figuring out how to deal with algal blooms was one of the motivations for the research. One of the study’s co-authors, Mohammad Moniruzzaman, explained, "By better understanding the diversity and role of giant viruses in the ocean and how they interact with algae and other ocean microbes, we can predict and possibly manage harmful algal blooms, which are human health hazards in Florida as well as all over the world.” Even some of Earth’s biggest problems are caused by small things.[Image description: A digital illustration of green viruses against a blue background.] Credit & copyright: Author-created illustration. Public Domain.
-
FREESTEM Daily Curio #3098Free1 CQ
These dinosaurs might have been impressive to look at, but their table manners were awful. While most animals have to chew their food thoroughly, it seems that wasn’t the case for sauropods, some of the largest dinosaurs ever to walk the Earth. Based on a recently discovered fossil, scientists now believe that sauropods hardly chewed their food at all.
Sauropods were members of Sauropoda, a clade of enormous, long-necked, vegetarian dinosaurs. Yet, for a long time, scientists didn’t know many specifics about sauropod diets. Paleontologists made the assumption that they ate plants based on two factors: they had flat teeth, which are good for processing plant matter, and sauropods were huge, meaning that there was no feasible way for them to have depended on anything other than plants, much like large herbivores today. Besides, their gigantic bodies, long necks, and long tails would have made them clumsy hunters. Now, not only do we have confirmation that sauropods ate plants, we know quite a bit about how they did it.
Researchers discovered a cololite—fossilized intestinal contents—that belonged to Diamantinasaurus matildae, a species of sauropod that lived around 100 million years ago. By performing a CT scan on the cololite, they found that the remains were composed entirely of plant matter. The leaves of the fern-like plant were largely intact, suggesting that the sauropod barely chewed them before swallowing. This means that sauropods were probably bulk feeders, ingesting as much plant matter as possible and relying on the natural fermentation process inside their digestive systems to break down their food. It’s a more extreme version of what many herbivores do today. Cows and other ruminants rely on fermentation to digest their food, and they also spend much of their time ruminating, which means they regurgitate their food to chew it again. You really needed a strong stomach to live in the Cretaceous period.
[Image description: A black-and-white illustration of a long-necked sauropod dinosaur.] Credit & copyright: Pearson Scott Foresman, Wikimedia Commons. This work has been released into the public domain by its author, Pearson Scott Foresman. This applies worldwide.These dinosaurs might have been impressive to look at, but their table manners were awful. While most animals have to chew their food thoroughly, it seems that wasn’t the case for sauropods, some of the largest dinosaurs ever to walk the Earth. Based on a recently discovered fossil, scientists now believe that sauropods hardly chewed their food at all.
Sauropods were members of Sauropoda, a clade of enormous, long-necked, vegetarian dinosaurs. Yet, for a long time, scientists didn’t know many specifics about sauropod diets. Paleontologists made the assumption that they ate plants based on two factors: they had flat teeth, which are good for processing plant matter, and sauropods were huge, meaning that there was no feasible way for them to have depended on anything other than plants, much like large herbivores today. Besides, their gigantic bodies, long necks, and long tails would have made them clumsy hunters. Now, not only do we have confirmation that sauropods ate plants, we know quite a bit about how they did it.
Researchers discovered a cololite—fossilized intestinal contents—that belonged to Diamantinasaurus matildae, a species of sauropod that lived around 100 million years ago. By performing a CT scan on the cololite, they found that the remains were composed entirely of plant matter. The leaves of the fern-like plant were largely intact, suggesting that the sauropod barely chewed them before swallowing. This means that sauropods were probably bulk feeders, ingesting as much plant matter as possible and relying on the natural fermentation process inside their digestive systems to break down their food. It’s a more extreme version of what many herbivores do today. Cows and other ruminants rely on fermentation to digest their food, and they also spend much of their time ruminating, which means they regurgitate their food to chew it again. You really needed a strong stomach to live in the Cretaceous period.
[Image description: A black-and-white illustration of a long-necked sauropod dinosaur.] Credit & copyright: Pearson Scott Foresman, Wikimedia Commons. This work has been released into the public domain by its author, Pearson Scott Foresman. This applies worldwide.
June 11, 2025
-
11 minFREEWork Business CurioFree6 CQ
Hurricane season starts in two and a half weeks. Last year, hurricanes caused $124 billion in damage. This year, the Trump administration is making cuts to t...
Hurricane season starts in two and a half weeks. Last year, hurricanes caused $124 billion in damage. This year, the Trump administration is making cuts to t...
-
FREEBiology Nerdy CurioFree1 CQ
These wild equines have got a bit of a mean streak, plus a whole lot of stripes! The rescue of an escaped pet zebra in Tennessee has recently gone viral after the animal was airlifted to safety, but very few people will ever own a zebra. That might seem odd, given that their close cousins, horses, are some of humanity’s most prized domesticated animals. There are plenty of good reasons why zebras have never been domesticated, though, and why you’ll (hopefully) never see a person riding one.
Zebras are part of the genus Equus, along with horses and wild asses. These three groups represent the only living members of the family Equidae, and zebras are the only ones that have never been domesticated by humans. There are three species of zebras, and all of them live in grasslands, shrublands, and savannahs across eastern and southern Africa. There, they live in herds of up to 20 individuals, eating grasses and small, shrubby plants. Their beautiful black-and-white stripes make them stand out to human eyes, but they also break up their individual silhouettes, so that predators have a harder time pinpointing a single zebra. That’s important, since zebras have to survive amongst some of the most fearsome predators on the planet, including lions, hyenas, crocodiles, and wild dogs, among others. When confronted by predators, zebras will group close together to deter them. When that isn’t enough, however, zebras can and will fight, lashing out with powerful kicks and bites.
Unfortunately for humans, the behavioral adaptations that make zebras so perfectly suited for their African home are exactly the ones that make them impossible to domesticate. Zebras are aggressive enough to fend off lions, so would-be-zebra-riders don’t stand much of a chance. Zebras have a strong “ducking” instinct, which helps them protect their throats from predators in the wild. In a domesticated setting, it means that zebras are all but impossible to lasso or leash, and that they struggle against bridles. Zebras also don’t have a hierarchical herd structure, like wild horses do. This means that there are no leaders in wild zebra herds, which would make it pretty difficult for a zebra to accept a human as its leader. All in all, while zebras might look a bit like horses, they’re really a different stripe of creature entirely.
[Image description: A zebra walking through grass and brush.] Credit & copyright: Alvinategyeka, Wikimedia Commons. This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.These wild equines have got a bit of a mean streak, plus a whole lot of stripes! The rescue of an escaped pet zebra in Tennessee has recently gone viral after the animal was airlifted to safety, but very few people will ever own a zebra. That might seem odd, given that their close cousins, horses, are some of humanity’s most prized domesticated animals. There are plenty of good reasons why zebras have never been domesticated, though, and why you’ll (hopefully) never see a person riding one.
Zebras are part of the genus Equus, along with horses and wild asses. These three groups represent the only living members of the family Equidae, and zebras are the only ones that have never been domesticated by humans. There are three species of zebras, and all of them live in grasslands, shrublands, and savannahs across eastern and southern Africa. There, they live in herds of up to 20 individuals, eating grasses and small, shrubby plants. Their beautiful black-and-white stripes make them stand out to human eyes, but they also break up their individual silhouettes, so that predators have a harder time pinpointing a single zebra. That’s important, since zebras have to survive amongst some of the most fearsome predators on the planet, including lions, hyenas, crocodiles, and wild dogs, among others. When confronted by predators, zebras will group close together to deter them. When that isn’t enough, however, zebras can and will fight, lashing out with powerful kicks and bites.
Unfortunately for humans, the behavioral adaptations that make zebras so perfectly suited for their African home are exactly the ones that make them impossible to domesticate. Zebras are aggressive enough to fend off lions, so would-be-zebra-riders don’t stand much of a chance. Zebras have a strong “ducking” instinct, which helps them protect their throats from predators in the wild. In a domesticated setting, it means that zebras are all but impossible to lasso or leash, and that they struggle against bridles. Zebras also don’t have a hierarchical herd structure, like wild horses do. This means that there are no leaders in wild zebra herds, which would make it pretty difficult for a zebra to accept a human as its leader. All in all, while zebras might look a bit like horses, they’re really a different stripe of creature entirely.
[Image description: A zebra walking through grass and brush.] Credit & copyright: Alvinategyeka, Wikimedia Commons. This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. -
FREEMusic Appreciation Daily Curio #3097Free1 CQ
You’ll probably never hear someone sing it at a karaoke bar, but it’s still the most frequently-sung song in English. Happy Birthday is an indispensable part of birthday celebrations around the world, and the composer of the melody, Mildred J. Hill, was born this month in 1859 in Louisville, Kentucky. Hill came up with the now-famous tune in 1893, and the lyrics were written by her sister Patty, but the song they wrote wasn’t actually Happy Birthday. Instead, it was called Good Morning to All, and was meant to be sung by a teacher and their classroom. Patty was a pioneer in early childhood education. In fact, she is credited as the inventor of the modern concept of a kindergarten, and she sang Good Morning to All in her own classroom as a daily greeting.
The Hill sisters published Good Morning to All and other compositions in 1893’s Song Stories for the Kindergarten. Soon, the melody took on a life of its own. No one knows exactly how it happened, but the tune began to be used to wish someone a happy birthday. One credible account even credits the Hill sisters themselves, who were believed to have changed the lyrics during a birthday get-together they were attending. Regardless of how it happened, Happy Birthday began to spread. By the early 20th century, the song appeared in movies, plays, and even other songbooks without crediting the Hill sisters. Mildred passed away in 1916, and Patty passed away in 1946, neither being credited as the originators of Happy Birthday. Their youngest sister, Jessica Hill, took it upon herself to copyright the song and have the publisher of Song Stories for the Kindergarten re-release it in 1935. The rights to the song eventually went to another publishing company and for decades after, the rights to the song were privately held, which is why movies had to pay royalties to use it, and why restaurants wishing their patrons a happy birthday had to sing a proprietary or royalty-free song instead. Then, in 2013, the publishing company was taken to court with claims that the copyright to Happy Birthday had expired years earlier. Finally, in 2016, the song entered public domain. It’s a short and simple ditty, but its story is anything but.
[Image description: A birthday cake with lit candles in a dark setting.] Credit & copyright: Fancibaer, Wikimedia Commons. This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.You’ll probably never hear someone sing it at a karaoke bar, but it’s still the most frequently-sung song in English. Happy Birthday is an indispensable part of birthday celebrations around the world, and the composer of the melody, Mildred J. Hill, was born this month in 1859 in Louisville, Kentucky. Hill came up with the now-famous tune in 1893, and the lyrics were written by her sister Patty, but the song they wrote wasn’t actually Happy Birthday. Instead, it was called Good Morning to All, and was meant to be sung by a teacher and their classroom. Patty was a pioneer in early childhood education. In fact, she is credited as the inventor of the modern concept of a kindergarten, and she sang Good Morning to All in her own classroom as a daily greeting.
The Hill sisters published Good Morning to All and other compositions in 1893’s Song Stories for the Kindergarten. Soon, the melody took on a life of its own. No one knows exactly how it happened, but the tune began to be used to wish someone a happy birthday. One credible account even credits the Hill sisters themselves, who were believed to have changed the lyrics during a birthday get-together they were attending. Regardless of how it happened, Happy Birthday began to spread. By the early 20th century, the song appeared in movies, plays, and even other songbooks without crediting the Hill sisters. Mildred passed away in 1916, and Patty passed away in 1946, neither being credited as the originators of Happy Birthday. Their youngest sister, Jessica Hill, took it upon herself to copyright the song and have the publisher of Song Stories for the Kindergarten re-release it in 1935. The rights to the song eventually went to another publishing company and for decades after, the rights to the song were privately held, which is why movies had to pay royalties to use it, and why restaurants wishing their patrons a happy birthday had to sing a proprietary or royalty-free song instead. Then, in 2013, the publishing company was taken to court with claims that the copyright to Happy Birthday had expired years earlier. Finally, in 2016, the song entered public domain. It’s a short and simple ditty, but its story is anything but.
[Image description: A birthday cake with lit candles in a dark setting.] Credit & copyright: Fancibaer, Wikimedia Commons. This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.
June 10, 2025
-
7 minFREEWork Business CurioFree4 CQ
From the BBC World Service: Japan is facing a rice emergency. Prices are soaring, supplies are tight, and it's already cost one government minister his job. ...
From the BBC World Service: Japan is facing a rice emergency. Prices are soaring, supplies are tight, and it's already cost one government minister his job. ...
-
2 minFREEHumanities Word CurioFree2 CQ
Word of the Day
: June 10, 2025\muh-NOO-shee-uh\ noun
What It Means
Minutia refers to a small or minor detail. It is usually used in its plur...
with Merriam-WebsterWord of the Day
: June 10, 2025\muh-NOO-shee-uh\ noun
What It Means
Minutia refers to a small or minor detail. It is usually used in its plur...
-
FREEMusic Appreciation Song CurioFree2 CQ
He wasn’t just sly, he was downright wise. American musician and record producer Sly Stone passed away yesterday at age 82. As the frontman for the R&B and soul band Sly and the Family Stone, he helped shape Americans' perceptions of both genres in the 60s, 70s, and 80s. Stone was a famously upbeat figure, and much of his music focused on equality and racial harmony during times when both often seemed to be in short supply. This is especially true of 1970’s Everybody Is A Star, which tells listeners, over the band’s signature slow, groovy instrumentals, that everybody deserves to be who they are and “shine”, regardless of their background or what the media told them they should be. The song hit number one on the Billboard Hot 100 in February, 1970, and stayed there for two weeks. It’s no wonder that, at a time when music genres were often categorized as being “for” one racial group or another, Sly and the Family Stone managed to bring together some of the most diverse audiences of the day. Stone knew that music, like stars, should shine for everyone.
He wasn’t just sly, he was downright wise. American musician and record producer Sly Stone passed away yesterday at age 82. As the frontman for the R&B and soul band Sly and the Family Stone, he helped shape Americans' perceptions of both genres in the 60s, 70s, and 80s. Stone was a famously upbeat figure, and much of his music focused on equality and racial harmony during times when both often seemed to be in short supply. This is especially true of 1970’s Everybody Is A Star, which tells listeners, over the band’s signature slow, groovy instrumentals, that everybody deserves to be who they are and “shine”, regardless of their background or what the media told them they should be. The song hit number one on the Billboard Hot 100 in February, 1970, and stayed there for two weeks. It’s no wonder that, at a time when music genres were often categorized as being “for” one racial group or another, Sly and the Family Stone managed to bring together some of the most diverse audiences of the day. Stone knew that music, like stars, should shine for everyone.
-
FREEEngineering Daily Curio #3096Free1 CQ
When it comes to engineering, there are always new uses for old standbys. Putting ice in your drink is a pretty rudimentary way to keep cool when it’s hot out, but Manhattan is putting a new twist on it by using ice to cool an entire building. Most modern air conditioners are a double-edged sword because, while they keep people comfortable and safe from extreme heat, they also consume a lot of electricity. As average global temperatures continue to rise, that puts more and more strain on city’s power grids, especially during peak daytime hours. The cooling system at New York City’s iconic Eleven Madison building is different. It does most of its work at night, when the city’s energy grid isn’t nearly as taxed.
Created by Trane Technologies, the system is called an ice battery. Every night, it uses electricity to freeze water into around 500,000 pounds of ice. During the day, the ice is used to cool the air being pushed through the building’s vents. Since electricity costs more to produce during peak hours, the system can lower energy bills by as much as 40 percent. The ice battery also drastically reduces the overall amount of energy used to cool the building, which is good news for the grid and the environment as a whole. If more buildings adopt ice batteries in the near future, it could reduce the need for more power plants to be built, even as the climate continues to warm. That’s less land and fewer resources that will have to be devoted to cooling buildings.
Of course, it still takes quite a bit of electricity to freeze ice, even at night. Research is already underway to see if chilled but unfrozen water might be a viable alternative. If enough buildings and homes are able to use such thermal energy storage systems to replace traditional HVAC systems, the environmental impact would be enormous, even though the new systems aren’t entirely carbon neutral. A step in the right direction is always better than a step back.
[Image description: A piece of clear ice with a jagged edge on top.] Credit & copyright: Dāvis Mosāns from Salaspils, Latvia. Flickr, Wikimedia Commons. This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.When it comes to engineering, there are always new uses for old standbys. Putting ice in your drink is a pretty rudimentary way to keep cool when it’s hot out, but Manhattan is putting a new twist on it by using ice to cool an entire building. Most modern air conditioners are a double-edged sword because, while they keep people comfortable and safe from extreme heat, they also consume a lot of electricity. As average global temperatures continue to rise, that puts more and more strain on city’s power grids, especially during peak daytime hours. The cooling system at New York City’s iconic Eleven Madison building is different. It does most of its work at night, when the city’s energy grid isn’t nearly as taxed.
Created by Trane Technologies, the system is called an ice battery. Every night, it uses electricity to freeze water into around 500,000 pounds of ice. During the day, the ice is used to cool the air being pushed through the building’s vents. Since electricity costs more to produce during peak hours, the system can lower energy bills by as much as 40 percent. The ice battery also drastically reduces the overall amount of energy used to cool the building, which is good news for the grid and the environment as a whole. If more buildings adopt ice batteries in the near future, it could reduce the need for more power plants to be built, even as the climate continues to warm. That’s less land and fewer resources that will have to be devoted to cooling buildings.
Of course, it still takes quite a bit of electricity to freeze ice, even at night. Research is already underway to see if chilled but unfrozen water might be a viable alternative. If enough buildings and homes are able to use such thermal energy storage systems to replace traditional HVAC systems, the environmental impact would be enormous, even though the new systems aren’t entirely carbon neutral. A step in the right direction is always better than a step back.
[Image description: A piece of clear ice with a jagged edge on top.] Credit & copyright: Dāvis Mosāns from Salaspils, Latvia. Flickr, Wikimedia Commons. This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.
June 9, 2025
-
FREEBiology Daily Curio #3095Free1 CQ
What's the matter, cat got your head? Burmese pythons and other invasive species have been wreaking havoc in the Florida everglades for years, but it seems the local wildlife is starting to fight back. Burmese pythons are a particularly big problem in Florida. The snakes have no natural predators once fully grown, and they are prolific at multiplying. State officials have tried everything to get rid of the reptilian invaders, including declaring open season on the snakes and rewarding hunters for every one they bring in, but it seems that nothing can wipe them out completely. Meanwhile, pythons are capable of eating anything that can fit inside their surprisingly stretchy jaws, including other, native predators like alligators. For years, scientists have been keeping a keen eye on the state’s python population, and part of that includes strapping radio trackers on male pythons during breeding season. The males lead researchers to nests, so that eggs and female pythons can be removed.
Yet, when scientists rolled up to the location of one of these radio-tracked pythons recently, they didn't find a cozy love nest. Instead, they found the snake’s decapitated body, which weighed a whopping 52 pounds. After setting up a trail camera near the corpse, they found the culprit—a common bobcat happily munching away on the remains. This marks the first time that a bobcat has been known to take down a python, and it's all the more shocking considering the python's size. While bobcats have never been known to hunt and eat pythons, the snakes have been found with bobcat claws still inside them. This led scientists to believe that bobcats were unable to defend themselves against the snakes. On paper, it's obvious why—adult bobcats weigh around 30 to 40 pounds, while Burmese pythons can weigh around 200 pounds. Maybe nature has simply had enough, or maybe this cat was just particularly skilled at punching (or clawing) above its weight.
[Image description: A bobcat in tall grass from the chest up.] Credit & copyright: National Park Services, Asset ID: 8859334f-c426-41db-9049-96e7d5dd5779. Public domain: Full Granting Rights.What's the matter, cat got your head? Burmese pythons and other invasive species have been wreaking havoc in the Florida everglades for years, but it seems the local wildlife is starting to fight back. Burmese pythons are a particularly big problem in Florida. The snakes have no natural predators once fully grown, and they are prolific at multiplying. State officials have tried everything to get rid of the reptilian invaders, including declaring open season on the snakes and rewarding hunters for every one they bring in, but it seems that nothing can wipe them out completely. Meanwhile, pythons are capable of eating anything that can fit inside their surprisingly stretchy jaws, including other, native predators like alligators. For years, scientists have been keeping a keen eye on the state’s python population, and part of that includes strapping radio trackers on male pythons during breeding season. The males lead researchers to nests, so that eggs and female pythons can be removed.
Yet, when scientists rolled up to the location of one of these radio-tracked pythons recently, they didn't find a cozy love nest. Instead, they found the snake’s decapitated body, which weighed a whopping 52 pounds. After setting up a trail camera near the corpse, they found the culprit—a common bobcat happily munching away on the remains. This marks the first time that a bobcat has been known to take down a python, and it's all the more shocking considering the python's size. While bobcats have never been known to hunt and eat pythons, the snakes have been found with bobcat claws still inside them. This led scientists to believe that bobcats were unable to defend themselves against the snakes. On paper, it's obvious why—adult bobcats weigh around 30 to 40 pounds, while Burmese pythons can weigh around 200 pounds. Maybe nature has simply had enough, or maybe this cat was just particularly skilled at punching (or clawing) above its weight.
[Image description: A bobcat in tall grass from the chest up.] Credit & copyright: National Park Services, Asset ID: 8859334f-c426-41db-9049-96e7d5dd5779. Public domain: Full Granting Rights. -
FREEArt Appreciation Art CurioFree1 CQ
Take a good look at this one. Throughout the ages, people have come up with all sorts of ways to express their love for one another, and for a time, eye miniatures were all the rage. The piece above is a painting of a person's left eye and part of an eyebrow in black and white. The eye is framed in a decorative case. Popular in France during the late 1700s, eye miniatures were a way for two people to privately express their affections, often in secret. In 1786, the Prince of Wales (the future George IV) received an eye miniature from Maria Fitzherbert, a Catholic widow who he shared a hidden romance with. The two married in a secret ceremony that was technically illegal under English law, since it would have removed the prince from the line of succession for marrying a Catholic. Though their on-and-off romance ultimately ended in disaster, upon his death, George IV was found with Fitzherbert's gift from decades before. It’s pretty impressive to maintain eye contact even in death!
Eye Miniature, British Painter (early 19th century),Ivory, .25 x .5 in. (.63 x 1.27 cm.), The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York City, New York
[Image credit & copyright:The Metropolitan Museum of Art, British Painter (early 19th century.) Gift of Mr. and Mrs. John W. Starr, 1954. Public Domain.]Take a good look at this one. Throughout the ages, people have come up with all sorts of ways to express their love for one another, and for a time, eye miniatures were all the rage. The piece above is a painting of a person's left eye and part of an eyebrow in black and white. The eye is framed in a decorative case. Popular in France during the late 1700s, eye miniatures were a way for two people to privately express their affections, often in secret. In 1786, the Prince of Wales (the future George IV) received an eye miniature from Maria Fitzherbert, a Catholic widow who he shared a hidden romance with. The two married in a secret ceremony that was technically illegal under English law, since it would have removed the prince from the line of succession for marrying a Catholic. Though their on-and-off romance ultimately ended in disaster, upon his death, George IV was found with Fitzherbert's gift from decades before. It’s pretty impressive to maintain eye contact even in death!
Eye Miniature, British Painter (early 19th century),Ivory, .25 x .5 in. (.63 x 1.27 cm.), The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York City, New York
[Image credit & copyright:The Metropolitan Museum of Art, British Painter (early 19th century.) Gift of Mr. and Mrs. John W. Starr, 1954. Public Domain.] -
9 minFREEWork Business CurioFree5 CQ
The White House triggered a sharp increase in tariffs on imported metals on Wednesday. The tax at the border is now 50%. But one trading partner got an exemp...
The White House triggered a sharp increase in tariffs on imported metals on Wednesday. The tax at the border is now 50%. But one trading partner got an exemp...
June 8, 2025
-
2 minFREEHumanities Word CurioFree2 CQ
Word of the Day
: June 8, 2025\KAT-uh-rakt\ noun
What It Means
Cataract refers to a clouding of the lens of the eye, or of its surrounding tr...
with Merriam-WebsterWord of the Day
: June 8, 2025\KAT-uh-rakt\ noun
What It Means
Cataract refers to a clouding of the lens of the eye, or of its surrounding tr...
-
FREEArchitecture PP&T CurioFree1 CQ
These buildings are certainly imposing…perhaps even brutally so! Brutalism is undoubtedly one of the most divisive architectural styles ever created. Most people either love it or hate it. Regardless of aesthetic opinion, though, the style has an interesting history, and its name doesn’t actually mean what one might assume.
Brutalism is an architectural style that focuses on plainness, showcasing bare building materials like concrete, steel, and glass without paint or other ornamentation. Brutalist buildings often feature large blocks of concrete and simple, geometric shapes that give them something of a “building-block” look. It’s a common misconception that the term “brutalism” derives from the word “brutal”, as in cruel, due to its imposing look. Rather, the term comes from the French word béton brut, meaning “raw concrete.” In the 1950s and 60s, when brutalism first became popular, raw concrete was usually hidden rather than showcased in architecture, which made the new style stand out.
Brutalism’s popularity began in Europe, not long after the end of World War II. It was then that Swiss-French architectural designer Charles-Édouard Jeanneret, better known as Le Corbusier, designed the 18-story Unité d'Habitation in Marseille, France. The structure is now thought of as one of the first examples of brutalism, with its exposed concrete and geometric design. Le Corbusier didn’t actually label any of his work as brutalism, but he was a painter and great lover of modernist art, and translated many elements of the style into his architectural designs. Far from the grim reputation that brutalism is sometimes associated with today, Le Corbusier saw his architecture as part of a utopian future, in which simple form and minimalism would be parts of everyday, modern living. These ideas were particularly attractive in Europe after the devastation of World War II, and architects in Britain began to emulate the style.
There is some debate around who first coined the term “brutalism.” Many historians believe that it was Swedish architect Hans Asplund, who used the word in 1949 when describing a square, brick house in Uppsala, Sweden. Reyner Banham, a British architectural critic, undoubtedly popularized the name when he penned his 1955 essay, The New Brutalism. Once the term took off, a modernist philosophy similar to Le Corbusier’s began to be associated with brutalist design, and suddenly brutalism was an architectural movement, rather than just a style. Brutalist architects sought to move away from ornate, nostalgic, pre-war designs and into a new, modernized European age in which technology would help people live more equitable lives. Brutalist buildings began popping up in office complexes, on college campuses, and even in neighborhoods across Europe, Canada, Australia, and the U.S.
As ambitious as the brutalist philosophy was, the style was not to last. By the 1970s, brutalism had declined dramatically in popularity. Some complained about the aesthetics of the style, since brutalist buildings can be seen as imposing and, at worst, intimidating. Raw concrete is also prone to weathering and staining, so many brutalist buildings from the 50s were showing plenty of wear and tear by the 70s. Because brutalism was a style used for many public buildings, most of which were in cities, some people came to associate the style with crime in densely-populated areas, especially in the U.S. and Britain. Though plenty of brutalist architecture still exists today, much of it has been demolished, and new brutalist works are rarely made. Still, it’s remembered as one of the most unique architectural styles of the modern world. It took a lot of work for architecture to look so simple!
[Image description: A concrete, brutalist building. It is the Natural Resources Canada CanmetENERGY's building in the Bells Corners Complex in Haanel Drive, Ottawa.] Credit & copyright: CanmetCoop, Wikimedia Commons. The copyright holder of this work has released it into the public domain. This applies worldwide.These buildings are certainly imposing…perhaps even brutally so! Brutalism is undoubtedly one of the most divisive architectural styles ever created. Most people either love it or hate it. Regardless of aesthetic opinion, though, the style has an interesting history, and its name doesn’t actually mean what one might assume.
Brutalism is an architectural style that focuses on plainness, showcasing bare building materials like concrete, steel, and glass without paint or other ornamentation. Brutalist buildings often feature large blocks of concrete and simple, geometric shapes that give them something of a “building-block” look. It’s a common misconception that the term “brutalism” derives from the word “brutal”, as in cruel, due to its imposing look. Rather, the term comes from the French word béton brut, meaning “raw concrete.” In the 1950s and 60s, when brutalism first became popular, raw concrete was usually hidden rather than showcased in architecture, which made the new style stand out.
Brutalism’s popularity began in Europe, not long after the end of World War II. It was then that Swiss-French architectural designer Charles-Édouard Jeanneret, better known as Le Corbusier, designed the 18-story Unité d'Habitation in Marseille, France. The structure is now thought of as one of the first examples of brutalism, with its exposed concrete and geometric design. Le Corbusier didn’t actually label any of his work as brutalism, but he was a painter and great lover of modernist art, and translated many elements of the style into his architectural designs. Far from the grim reputation that brutalism is sometimes associated with today, Le Corbusier saw his architecture as part of a utopian future, in which simple form and minimalism would be parts of everyday, modern living. These ideas were particularly attractive in Europe after the devastation of World War II, and architects in Britain began to emulate the style.
There is some debate around who first coined the term “brutalism.” Many historians believe that it was Swedish architect Hans Asplund, who used the word in 1949 when describing a square, brick house in Uppsala, Sweden. Reyner Banham, a British architectural critic, undoubtedly popularized the name when he penned his 1955 essay, The New Brutalism. Once the term took off, a modernist philosophy similar to Le Corbusier’s began to be associated with brutalist design, and suddenly brutalism was an architectural movement, rather than just a style. Brutalist architects sought to move away from ornate, nostalgic, pre-war designs and into a new, modernized European age in which technology would help people live more equitable lives. Brutalist buildings began popping up in office complexes, on college campuses, and even in neighborhoods across Europe, Canada, Australia, and the U.S.
As ambitious as the brutalist philosophy was, the style was not to last. By the 1970s, brutalism had declined dramatically in popularity. Some complained about the aesthetics of the style, since brutalist buildings can be seen as imposing and, at worst, intimidating. Raw concrete is also prone to weathering and staining, so many brutalist buildings from the 50s were showing plenty of wear and tear by the 70s. Because brutalism was a style used for many public buildings, most of which were in cities, some people came to associate the style with crime in densely-populated areas, especially in the U.S. and Britain. Though plenty of brutalist architecture still exists today, much of it has been demolished, and new brutalist works are rarely made. Still, it’s remembered as one of the most unique architectural styles of the modern world. It took a lot of work for architecture to look so simple!
[Image description: A concrete, brutalist building. It is the Natural Resources Canada CanmetENERGY's building in the Bells Corners Complex in Haanel Drive, Ottawa.] Credit & copyright: CanmetCoop, Wikimedia Commons. The copyright holder of this work has released it into the public domain. This applies worldwide. -
10 minFREEWork Business CurioFree6 CQ
Expect the White House to keep trying to claw back money that Congress appropriated and that the Trump administration is supposed to spend. Administration of...
Expect the White House to keep trying to claw back money that Congress appropriated and that the Trump administration is supposed to spend. Administration of...
June 7, 2025
-
FREESports Sporty CurioFree1 CQ
You'll be in deep water if you cross that line! As the Enhanced Games are gathering steam for their inaugural event in May of 2026, World Aquatics has taken action to stop its athletes from participating. Founded by Australian businessman Aron D'Souza, the Enhanced Games is a sporting event that not only overlooks the use of performance enhancing drugs (PED), but encourages them. So far, nine events have been announced between swimming, track & field, and weightlifting. Athletes, like Greek swimmer Kristian Gkolomeev, are now openly taking PEDs to prepare for the competition. During a time trial in May, Gkolomeev set a time of 20.89 seconds in the 50m freestyle, "breaking" the world record set by Brazilian Cesar Cielo. Of course, it's unlikely that World Aquatics, the governing body that regulates water sports, will recognize Gkolomeev's time. In fact, he and other swimmers who are planning to compete in the Enhanced Games aren't likely to be allowed to compete in sanctioned events anytime soon. To keep swimmers from competing in the Enhanced Games, World Aquatics recently introduced a new bylaw that will ban any athletes, coaches, and other staff from future sanctioned events if they choose to participate at the Enhanced Games or similar competitions that encourage the use of PEDs. In the meantime, organizers of the Enhanced Games have pledged to provide legal support to any athletes who wish to challenge the ban. The lawyers probably don’t have PEDs of their own, though.
You'll be in deep water if you cross that line! As the Enhanced Games are gathering steam for their inaugural event in May of 2026, World Aquatics has taken action to stop its athletes from participating. Founded by Australian businessman Aron D'Souza, the Enhanced Games is a sporting event that not only overlooks the use of performance enhancing drugs (PED), but encourages them. So far, nine events have been announced between swimming, track & field, and weightlifting. Athletes, like Greek swimmer Kristian Gkolomeev, are now openly taking PEDs to prepare for the competition. During a time trial in May, Gkolomeev set a time of 20.89 seconds in the 50m freestyle, "breaking" the world record set by Brazilian Cesar Cielo. Of course, it's unlikely that World Aquatics, the governing body that regulates water sports, will recognize Gkolomeev's time. In fact, he and other swimmers who are planning to compete in the Enhanced Games aren't likely to be allowed to compete in sanctioned events anytime soon. To keep swimmers from competing in the Enhanced Games, World Aquatics recently introduced a new bylaw that will ban any athletes, coaches, and other staff from future sanctioned events if they choose to participate at the Enhanced Games or similar competitions that encourage the use of PEDs. In the meantime, organizers of the Enhanced Games have pledged to provide legal support to any athletes who wish to challenge the ban. The lawyers probably don’t have PEDs of their own, though.
June 6, 2025
-
10 minFREEWork Business CurioFree6 CQ
Call it an "it could have been worse" jobs report. In May, 139,000 more people drew paychecks, which is higher than expected. Job growth was up in sectors li...
Call it an "it could have been worse" jobs report. In May, 139,000 more people drew paychecks, which is higher than expected. Job growth was up in sectors li...
-
FREEMind + Body Daily CurioFree1 CQ
Would you like some sandwich with those fries? For anyone enjoying a horseshoe sandwich, it’s a fair question. Invented in Springfield, Illinois, Horseshoe sandwiches are a spectacle to behold, and a point of Midwestern pride. These open-faced, oversized sandwiches have been round since the 1920s, yet they haven’t spread far beyond the town where they were first concocted.
A horseshoe sandwich is an open-faced sandwich on thick toast, also known as Texas toast. It most commonly features a beef burger patty, though a slice of thick ham is sometimes used instead. On top of the meat is a tall pile of french fries drenched in cheese sauce. Though some modern horseshoe sandwiches use nacho cheese, traditionally the cheese sauce is inspired by Welsh rarebit, a dish of sharp cheddar cheese mixed with mustard, ale, or Worcestershire sauce served on toast.
Welsh rarebit played an important role in the formation of the horseshoe sandwich. Supposedly, in 1928, the swanky Leland hotel in downtown Springfield, Illinois was trying to attract new customers. Management asked hotel chef Joe Schweska to come up with a new, intriguing menu item. Schweska asked his wife, who had Welsh heritage, what she thought he should put on the menu. She suggested a spin on Welsh rarebit, So Schweska added french fries and a slice of thick-cut ham to the dish. The rest is history.
Except it’s difficult to know if Schweska was truly the first to make the sandwich. Some say that it was a different Leland chef, Steve Tomko, who actually invented the sandwich, since he later went on to serve it at the Red Coach Inn. Other Springfield restaurants soon had their own versions too, with several crediting themselves as the originators. No need to argue—there’s plenty of credit (and fries) to go around.
[Image description: A white plate with a hamburger patty covered in fries and white cheese sauce.] Credit & copyright: Dirtmound, Wikimdia Commons. This work has been released into the public domain by its author, Dirtmound at English Wikipedia. This applies worldwide.Would you like some sandwich with those fries? For anyone enjoying a horseshoe sandwich, it’s a fair question. Invented in Springfield, Illinois, Horseshoe sandwiches are a spectacle to behold, and a point of Midwestern pride. These open-faced, oversized sandwiches have been round since the 1920s, yet they haven’t spread far beyond the town where they were first concocted.
A horseshoe sandwich is an open-faced sandwich on thick toast, also known as Texas toast. It most commonly features a beef burger patty, though a slice of thick ham is sometimes used instead. On top of the meat is a tall pile of french fries drenched in cheese sauce. Though some modern horseshoe sandwiches use nacho cheese, traditionally the cheese sauce is inspired by Welsh rarebit, a dish of sharp cheddar cheese mixed with mustard, ale, or Worcestershire sauce served on toast.
Welsh rarebit played an important role in the formation of the horseshoe sandwich. Supposedly, in 1928, the swanky Leland hotel in downtown Springfield, Illinois was trying to attract new customers. Management asked hotel chef Joe Schweska to come up with a new, intriguing menu item. Schweska asked his wife, who had Welsh heritage, what she thought he should put on the menu. She suggested a spin on Welsh rarebit, So Schweska added french fries and a slice of thick-cut ham to the dish. The rest is history.
Except it’s difficult to know if Schweska was truly the first to make the sandwich. Some say that it was a different Leland chef, Steve Tomko, who actually invented the sandwich, since he later went on to serve it at the Red Coach Inn. Other Springfield restaurants soon had their own versions too, with several crediting themselves as the originators. No need to argue—there’s plenty of credit (and fries) to go around.
[Image description: A white plate with a hamburger patty covered in fries and white cheese sauce.] Credit & copyright: Dirtmound, Wikimdia Commons. This work has been released into the public domain by its author, Dirtmound at English Wikipedia. This applies worldwide.